Component resolution of g on an inclined plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between gravitational acceleration (g) and the acceleration of an object down an inclined plane (a) using trigonometry. The key point is that the correct relationship is derived from the triangle formed by the ramp, where the acceleration down the ramp is the opposite side and g is the hypotenuse. Participants clarify that the formula should be g = a/sin(theta), emphasizing that the component of gravity acting down the ramp cannot exceed the total gravitational force. Misinterpretation arises when attempting to use sin(theta) = g/a, which is incorrect due to the misidentification of the triangle's sides. Properly setting up the triangle is crucial for accurate calculations of g based on the ramp's angle and the measured acceleration.
themselv
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi, I just had a quick conceptual question.
I understand that if I have an object moving down a ramp, it is being accelerated only by gravity. My question is this:

We should be able to experimentally calculate g if we measure the acceleration down the ramp. Then we can use trigonometry to determine a value for g. However, this only works if you take the
acceleration down the ramp divided by the sin (theta) . I understand where this comes from (redrawing the angle theta in the middle where the object starts from), but why can we not calculate the component of gravity by saying:

sin (theta) = g / a

This makes more sense to me looking at the initial angle, because g appears to be the opposite side and the acceleration down the ramp appears to be the hypotenuse.

Can someone please help clarify?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
themselv said:

Homework Statement



Hi, I just had a quick conceptual question.
I understand that if I have an object moving down a ramp, it is being accelerated only by gravity. My question is this:

We should be able to experimentally calculate g if we measure the acceleration down the ramp. Then we can use trigonometry to determine a value for g. However, this only works if you take the
acceleration down the ramp divided by the sin (theta) . I understand where this comes from (redrawing the angle theta in the middle where the object starts from), but why can we not calculate the component of gravity by saying:

sin (theta) = g / a

This makes more sense to me looking at the initial angle, because g appears to be the opposite side and the acceleration down the ramp appears to be the hypotenuse.

Can someone please help clarify?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think it will be easier if you draw a diagram
 
pzqwWWV.png


I realize that an expression for g should be g = a/sin(theta) by looking at the angle that's formed perpendicular to the plane.

However, if I just look at angle theta in the bottom left corner, why am I not justified in saying g = sin(theta)*a, since to me it appears that the sine of angle theta is just opposite over hypotenuse, or g/a.
 
"However, if I just look at angle theta in the bottom left corner, why am I not justified in saying g = sin(theta)*a, since to me it appears that the sine of angle theta is just opposite over hypotenuse, or g/a."

Because you've not got the correct triangle set up. The hypoteneuse of a triangle is its longest side. The component of the gravitational acceleration (g) in the down incline direction is what gives you a. Since a component (a) can never exceed the full vector (g) in magnitude, it follows that a cannot be the hypoteneuse.

Chris.
 
The hypotenuse is the longest side, which is (correctly) labelled g in your diagram. The side opposite angle ## \theta ## is (correctly) labelled a. So opposite over hypotenuse is ## \frac{a}{g} ## not ## \frac{g}{a} ##.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top