Concentric Cylindrical Conducting Shells

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between capacitance, charge density, and potential difference in concentric cylindrical conducting shells. It is established that when the potential difference doubles, the capacitance remains unchanged due to its dependence on geometry rather than charge density. The increased charge density leads to a proportional increase in total charge, confirming that capacitance is a ratio of charge to potential difference. The new charge density for the outer shell is calculated to be 0.82μC/m, reflecting the doubling of the potential difference. Overall, the analysis confirms that while charge density changes, the capacitance remains constant.
maceng7
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The picture of the problem can be found here: http://www.2shared.com/photo/U_JIkDks/Capture.html

The questions that I'm having trouble with are:

(a) The magnitudes of the charge densities on the inner and outer shells are now changed (keeping λinner = -λouter) so that the resulting potential difference doubles (Vca,new = 2Vca,initial). How does Cnew, the capacitance of a one meter length of the system of conductors when the charge density is changed, compare to C, the initial capacitance of a one meter length of the system of conductors?

(b) What is λouter,new ?


Homework Equations



C = Q / ΔV
E = λ / 2∏rε
λ = Q/L

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) Alright for the first one I'm saying that the new capacitance will just equal the initial capacitance (before the charge densities were changed) because capacitance only depends on the geometry of the capacitor. If lambda is increased then that means the charges (Q) was increased, this increases the electric field which by this formula ΔV = Ed also increases the potential difference. Since the potential difference doubled, the total charge doubled (λ doubles) so the capacitance remains the same since it is only a ratio between the charge and potential difference.

(b) From above since potential difference doubled then λ must double as well so my new λ is 0.82μC/m

Does this seem correct? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maceng7 said:

Homework Statement


The picture of the problem can be found here: http://www.2shared.com/photo/U_JIkDks/Capture.html
The questions that I'm having trouble with are:

(a) The magnitudes of the charge densities on the inner and outer shells are now changed (keeping λinner = -λouter) so that the resulting potential difference doubles (Vca,new = 2Vca,initial). How does Cnew, the capacitance of a one meter length of the system of conductors when the charge density is changed, compare to C, the initial capacitance of a one meter length of the system of conductors?
Correct.


(b) What is λouter,new ?


Homework Equations



C = Q / ΔV
E = λ / 2∏rε
λ = Q/L

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) Alright for the first one I'm saying that the new capacitance will just equal the initial capacitance (before the charge densities were changed) because capacitance only depends on the geometry of the capacitor. If lambda is increased then that means the charges (Q) was increased, this increases the electric field which by this formula ΔV = Ed also increases the potential difference. Since the potential difference doubled, the total charge doubled (λ doubles) so the capacitance remains the same since it is only a ratio between the charge and potential difference.

(b) From above since potential difference doubled then λ must double as well so my new λ is 0.82μC/m

Does this seem correct? Thanks

Yes. Referring to a unit length of the cable, Q = CV, C hasn't changed so since V has doubled, so has Q.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top