Conductivity homework problem help

AI Thread Summary
To determine the temperature at which a carbon resistor has a resistance of 995 ohms, starting from 1000 ohms at 20 degrees Celsius, one must consider the relationship between resistance and temperature, typically described by the temperature coefficient of resistance. The discussion highlights a lack of resources, including textbooks, which complicates understanding the necessary equations. Participants suggest using online resources for guidance and emphasize the importance of distinguishing between conductivity and resistivity in calculations. The conversation reflects frustration over the abrupt change in teaching and the need for foundational knowledge in the subject. Overall, understanding the principles of resistivity and temperature dependence is crucial for solving the problem.
weston_sagle
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At what temperature does a carbon resistor have a resistance of 995 ohms, if it has a resistance of 1000 ohms at 20 degrees? What is its conductivity at the new temperature?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I don't even know where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Do you have any equations that relate the change of some property (e.g. resistivity) of a conductor with temperature changes?
 


Well, the situation isn't ideal. We recently got a new teacher, after our old teacher canceled 2 weeks of classes. Now we are trying to catch up so we have an assignment on material we haven't covered. I also have no textbook for the class. I did google searches but could only find R= conductivity*L/A but I don't have length or area.
 


Check out this link then:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/restmp.html

Then think about the connections between resistance, resistivity, and conductivity.

I don't understand why there is no text for the course. Is this a college-level course? There are many older editions of quality texts that you can get dirt cheap through Amazon.com, for example.

Also, the equation you quoted in your previous post should have "conductivity" replaced with "resistivity", according to one of my texts.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top