Conical Surface Potential Difference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the potential difference between two points on a conical surface with a uniform surface charge. The initial assumption was that the potential at the vertex (point a) is zero, which led to a discrepancy with the book's solution. The correct approach involves understanding where to set the reference potential to zero, typically at infinity for point charges. The integration for potential at point b was clarified, revealing that the logarithmic argument should be 1 + √2 instead of 1 + (√2/2). The conversation highlights the importance of correctly defining reference points in potential calculations.
Aroldo
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hey guys!
The question is related to problem 2.26 from Electrodynamics by Griffiths (3ed).

1. Homework Statement

A conical surface (an empty ice-cream cone) carries a uniform surface charge σ. The height of the cone is h, as the radius of the top. Find the potential difference between points a (the vertex) and b (the center of the top).

Homework Equations


Here I will call the potential V.

First of all, I assumed that at the vertex: V(a) = 0. (I can do that because I'm interested in V(b) - V(a), am I right?)

Then I calculated V(b). So:
V(a) - V(b) = - V(b) = -σh/(2ε) * ln (1 + (21/2/2))

But the book's solution didn't consider V(a) = 0, and found:
V(a) - V(b) = σh/(2ε) [1 - ln (1 + (21/2/2))]

Finally, my questions are:
Why is my assumption wrong?
How to calculate it assuming V(b) = 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aroldo said:
First of all, I assumed that at the vertex: V(a) = 0. (I can do that because I'm interested in V(b) - V(a), am I right?)

Then I calculated V(b). So:
V(a) - V(b) = - V(b) = -σh/(2ε) * ln (1 + (21/2/2))
In deriving your expression for V(b), where did you choose V to be zero?
 
TSny said:
In deriving your expression for V(b), where did you choose V to be zero?
At the point a = (0,0,0)
 
Can you show an outline of your derivation of your expression for V(b)?
 
Yes, of course.
r is the vector along the central axis and r' is the vector along the conical surface.

$$ V(b) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_0^b{\frac{\sigma\cdot da'}{|\textbf{r}-\textbf{r}'|}} = \frac{\sigma}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\sqrt{2}\pi\int_0^{\sqrt{2}h}\frac{r'dr'}{\sqrt{r'^2 + h^2 -\sqrt{2}hr'}} = \frac{\sigma h}{2\epsilon_0}\ln (1+\sqrt{2}) $$
 
Last edited:
Aroldo said:
$$ V(b) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_0^b{\frac{\sigma\cdot da}{|\textbf{r}-\textbf{r}'|}} $$
The integrand represents the potential at b due to a small element of charge ##\sigma da##. It has the form ##V = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q}{r}## for a point charge. Note that this expression assumes a particular place where V = 0. Where is that place?
 
  • Like
Likes Aroldo
For a point charge, V = 0 at the infinity.
You helped me a lot to identify my own misunderstanding. In the previous exercise that I solved the potential wouldn't go to 0 at the infinity (it was due to a infinity distribution).

Thank you a lot!
 
OK.

I'm not quite getting the result that you quoted as the given solution. I get that the argument of the log should be ##1 + \sqrt{2}## rather than ##1 + \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}## . But I could be messing up somewhere.
 
No no, you are right. My mistake. I already edited there.

Thanks again.
 
Back
Top