Conservation of angular momentum of a uniform thin rod

AI Thread Summary
A uniform thin rod of length 0.471 m and mass 4.0 kg rotates freely about its center after a bullet of mass 3.0 g strikes it at a 60° angle. The rod's angular velocity post-collision is 6.99 rad/s, and the challenge is to determine the bullet's velocity before impact. The moment of inertia of the rod is calculated as 0.0740024 kg·m², leading to a calculated momentum of 0.51727 kg·m²/s. The bullet's contribution to the system's inertia must be considered, as it lodges in the rod, affecting the overall rotational dynamics. The initial calculation for the bullet's velocity yields 851 m/s, indicating a need to reassess the inclusion of the bullet's mass in the inertia calculation.
ViewtifulBeau
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
A uniform thin rod of length 0.471 m and mass 4.0 kg can rotate freely on a frictionless horizontal plane about a vertical axis through its center. The rod is at rest when a 3.0 g bullet traveling in the horizontal plane of the rod is fired into one end of the rod. As viewed from above, the direction of the bullet's velocity makes an angle of 60° with the rod.

If the bullet lodges in the rod and the angular velocity of the rod is 6.99 rad/s immediately after the collision, what is the magnitude of the bullet's velocity just before impact?

This is a hard one. I found the inertia of the rod to be .0740024 (4.003/12)*.471^2
The angular velocity is 6.99.
.0740024 * 6.99 is the momentum = .51727

I also know that momentum is the cross product of the radius and the tangential momentum (bullet momentum). Since the radius and the momentum is perpendicular you just multiply. so (.471/2) * .003 *sin(60)*v = 6.18829e-4 * v. Then the .51727 / 6.18829e-4 = v. to find 851 m/s but this is not right, what did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only thing you neglected was the fact that the bullet lodges into the rod and thus adds to the rotational inertia of the system after the impact. Other than that, it looks OK.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top