Conservation of Angular Momentum of particle

AI Thread Summary
A 2.80 kg particle collides inelastically with a 4.00 kg particle, leading to a calculation of the angular momentum with respect to the origin. The confusion arises from the use of different coordinate systems (ij and xy), but it is clarified that they are related. The angular momentum is calculated using the formula L = m(r x v), leading to a final result of 6.02 kg*m^2/s in the k direction. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the coordinate systems for accurate calculations. The solution is confirmed and appreciated by participants in the discussion.
Versaiteis
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2.80 kg particle that is moving horizontally over a floor with velocity (-3.00 m/s) \widehat{j}undergoes a completely inelastic collision with a 4.00 kg particle that is moving horizontally over the floor with velocity (4.55 m/s)\widehat{i}. The collision occurs at xy coordinates (-0.50 m, -0.10 m). After the collision, what is the angular momentum of the stuck-together particles with respect to the origin?

answer = 6.02\widehat{k} kg*m^2/s

Homework Equations



L = m( r x v )

The Attempt at a Solution



I can't seem to understand exactly what I'm supposed to do, what keeps throwing me off is the two different coordinate systems, ij and xy. No matter what combinations of vectors I use, nothing comes close, so I guess what I'm looking for is a place to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Versaiteis said:
L = m( r x v )

The Attempt at a Solution



I can't seem to understand exactly what I'm supposed to do, what keeps throwing me off is the two different coordinate systems, ij and xy. No matter what combinations of vectors I use, nothing comes close, so I guess what I'm looking for is a place to start.
Keep in mind that the angular momentum vector is always perpendicular to the plane of \vec{r} \text{ and } \vec{v}.

The i, j, and k axes are all perpendicular to each other, of course. \hat i is the unit vector along the x-axis in the direction of + x. \hat j is the unit vector along the y-axis in the direction of +y. The \hat k direction is perpendicular to both the i and j unit vectors.

AM
 
Oh I see, the two systems are directly related so I can simply say

L = L_{1} + L_{2}

L_{1} = 2.8 * (-0.5 * -3.00)
L_{2} = 4.0 * ( 0 - (-0.1 * 4.55))

Sure enough

L = 6.02\widehat{k} kg*m^2/s

Thank you for your help Andrew
 
Versaiteis said:
Oh I see, the two systems are directly related so I can simply say

L = L_{1} + L_{2}

L_{1} = 2.8 * (-0.5 * -3.00)
L_{2} = 4.0 * ( 0 - (-0.1 * 4.55))

Sure enough

L = 6.02\widehat{k} kg*m^2/s

Thank you for your help Andrew
No problemo.

AM
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top