Conservation of Momentum/Collisions

  • Thread starter Thread starter happycreature
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conservation
AI Thread Summary
A bullet of mass 6.00g is fired into a wooden block of mass 1.21kg, and the problem involves calculating the bullet's initial velocity after the block slides 0.260m before stopping due to friction. The initial approach using the work-energy theorem was incorrect because not all kinetic energy is conserved in an inelastic collision. Instead, conservation of momentum should be applied to find the final velocity of the block and bullet together, followed by using the work-energy theorem to account for the frictional force. The correct initial velocity of the bullet was determined to be 208.75 m/s after addressing conceptual misunderstandings regarding energy conservation in inelastic collisions. This discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between kinetic energy and momentum in collision problems.
happycreature
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, this is my first post to the forums. Nice to meet you all and thank you in advance.

Homework Statement


A bullet of mass 6.00g is fired horizontally into a wooden block of mass 1.21kg resting on a horizontal surface. The coefficient of kinetic friction between block and surface is 0.210. The bullet remains embedded in the block, which is observed to slide a distance 0.260m along the surface before stopping.

What is the initial velocity of the bullet?

Mass of bullet = 6.00g = 0.006kg
Mass of block = 1.21kg (+bullet) = 1.216
Coeff. of friction µk = 0.210
∆d = 0.260m

Homework Equations


∆KE + ∆PE = -Wnc
KE = 1/2mv^2
Work = F∆d
F(kf) = µk(N)
*F∆t = m(vf - vi)

The Attempt at a Solution



F(sf) = Coeff. friction x normal force = (.210)(1.21)(9.8) = 2.49 N

Work = F∆d
Work done by friction = (2.49N)(0.260m) = -0.647 J

No potential energy here so...
KEf - KEi = -0.647
KEf = 0 (the block slid to a stop)
KEi = -0.647
1/2mvi^2 = -0.647
vi = √(2)(0.647)/0.006 = 14.64 m/s

...Which is incorrect.

*Because this problem is in the chapter on momentum it seems like they want me to use an equation involving momentum, but I don't know 1)if this problem can or cannot be solved with the work-energy theorem and 2) when I would use the momentum equation in the above scenario.

For the record I also tried finding the initial velocity of the block (1.03 m/s) and putting that as my KEf for the bullet but the difference was negligible.

Any advice greatly appreciated - thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When the bullet hits the block, not all of its kinetic energy goes into moving the block. A lot of it will be lost in breaking up the chemical bonds in the wood to embed the bullet in there.

The analysis you did assumed that the initial kinetic energy of the block was equal to the kinetic energy of the bullet, which I do not think is correct.

I suggest finding the velocity of the block of wood that would be required for it to slide 0.26 m and then using conservation of momentum to find the bullet's velocity.

Edit - I am assuming that you're looking for the speed of the bullet.
 
Last edited:
Welcome to PF!

What is the question in the problem?

ehild
 
Sorry, forgot to add the question when I was writing it out! It's there now.

Harpoon, you're right. Since this is a completely inelastic collision KEf does not equal KEi. Thank you for the correction. Is this why the work-energy theorem would not work here? Because energy is not conserved?

It looks like I have to use initial and final momentums with KE = 1/2mv^2 to solve it. I'll take a second look.
 
There are two parts of your problem. First you have an inelastic collision between bullet and wood. You can apply conservation of momentum to get the final velocity of the block with embedded bullet. Then you have the block, the bullet inside, traveling with the velocity gained in the collision and decelerating because of friction. In that second stage, you can use Work-Energy Theorem.

ehild
 
...found the initial velocity of the block with the work-energy theorem, and then plugged that into m1v1 = (m1+m2)vf to solve for v1, which was 208.75 m/s (and correct).

It looks like I had some conceptual issues with work-energy and inelastic collisions.

Thanks everyone for your help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top