Consistency of Faraday's Law and Electric Field Equation in Optics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating the consistency of Faraday's Law and the electric field equation in optics, specifically using the equation E(r,t)=E0cos(k·r−ωt+φ). Participants suggest expressing the electric field as E=Eo e^{i(k·x−ωt+φ)} and applying vector calculus identities to compute the curl of E. The correct form of the magnetic field is identified as B(r,t)=((k×E)/ω)cos(k·r−ωt+φ). Additionally, a correction is noted regarding the phase factor φ, which should have a plus sign.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave equations
  • Familiarity with vector calculus identities
  • Knowledge of complex exponentials in physics
  • Proficiency in taking curls and gradients of vector fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electromagnetic wave equations in vacuum
  • Learn about vector calculus identities, particularly in the context of electromagnetism
  • Explore the application of complex numbers in wave mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of phase factors in wave equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism and optics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to Faraday's Law and electric fields.

Blue Kangaroo
Messages
41
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Suppose that an electric field is given by E(r,t)=E0cos(k·r−ωt+φ), where k⊥E0 and φ is a constant phase. Show that B(r,t)=((k×E)/ω)B(k⋅r-ωt+φ) is consistent with ∇×E=-∂B/∂t

Homework Equations


∇×E=-∂B/∂t

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I have to take the curl of E, but I'm not sure how to go about doing it.
∂E/∂t would be ωE0sin(k⋅r-ωt+φ) and ∂E/∂r would be -kE0sin(k⋅r-ωt+φ), but I'm not sure if that helps. Also, by my calculation, -∂B/∂t= (k×E)cos(k⋅r-ωt+φ).
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Suggestion is to write the ## E ## field as ##E=\vec{ E}_o e^{i (\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}-\omega t +\phi)} ## and take the real part afterwards. Also, there is a vector calculus identity that ## \nabla \times (\psi \vec{a})=(\nabla \psi) \times \vec{a} +\psi (\nabla \times \vec{a}) ##. The operation then becomes doing a gradient on ## e^{i(\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}-\omega t + \phi)} ##. ## \\ ## And I think you have a typo: the second phase factor ## \phi ## should have a plus sign, like the first one. ## \\ ## Addition note: ## \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}=k_x x+k_y y+k_z z ##. You can readily compute the gradient in these Cartesian coordinates. ## \\ ## Additional suggestion: Let ## B=B_o e^{i (\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}- \omega t+\phi)} ##. And what you have should read ## B(r,t)=\frac{\vec{k} \times \vec{E}}{\omega} cos(\vec{k} \cdot \vec{r}-\omega t+\phi )##. The rest is straightforward.
 
Last edited:
Charles Link said:
Suggestion is to write the ## E ## field as ##E=\vec{ E}_o e^{i (\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}-\omega t +\phi)} ## and take the real part afterwards. Also, there is a vector calculus identity that ## \nabla \times (\psi \vec{a})=(\nabla \psi) \times \vec{a} +\psi (\nabla \times \vec{a}) ##. The operation then becomes doing a gradient on ## e^{i(\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}-\omega t )} ##. ## \\ ## And I think you have a typo: the second phase factor ## \phi ## should have a plus sign, like the first one. ## \\ ## Addition note: ## \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}=k_x x+k_y y+k_z z ##. You can readily compute the gradient in these Cartesian coordinates. ## \\ ## Additional suggestion: Let ## B=B_o e^{i (\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}- \omega t+\phi)} ##. And what you have should read ## B(r,t)=\frac{\vec{k} \times \vec{E}}{\omega} cos(\vec{k} \cdot \vec{r}-\omega t+\phi )##. The rest is straightforward.
Thank you, I should be able to take it from here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K