Consistency of Faraday's Law and Electric Field Equation in Optics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating the consistency of Faraday's Law with the given electric field equation. Participants suggest expressing the electric field in exponential form and taking its real part for easier manipulation. A vector calculus identity is highlighted to aid in calculating the curl of the electric field. Additionally, a potential typo in the phase factor is pointed out, and Cartesian coordinates are recommended for computing the gradient. Overall, the conversation provides guidance on how to approach the problem effectively.
Blue Kangaroo
Messages
41
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Suppose that an electric field is given by E(r,t)=E0cos(k·r−ωt+φ), where k⊥E0 and φ is a constant phase. Show that B(r,t)=((k×E)/ω)B(k⋅r-ωt+φ) is consistent with ∇×E=-∂B/∂t

Homework Equations


∇×E=-∂B/∂t

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I have to take the curl of E, but I'm not sure how to go about doing it.
∂E/∂t would be ωE0sin(k⋅r-ωt+φ) and ∂E/∂r would be -kE0sin(k⋅r-ωt+φ), but I'm not sure if that helps. Also, by my calculation, -∂B/∂t= (k×E)cos(k⋅r-ωt+φ).
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Suggestion is to write the ## E ## field as ##E=\vec{ E}_o e^{i (\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}-\omega t +\phi)} ## and take the real part afterwards. Also, there is a vector calculus identity that ## \nabla \times (\psi \vec{a})=(\nabla \psi) \times \vec{a} +\psi (\nabla \times \vec{a}) ##. The operation then becomes doing a gradient on ## e^{i(\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}-\omega t + \phi)} ##. ## \\ ## And I think you have a typo: the second phase factor ## \phi ## should have a plus sign, like the first one. ## \\ ## Addition note: ## \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}=k_x x+k_y y+k_z z ##. You can readily compute the gradient in these Cartesian coordinates. ## \\ ## Additional suggestion: Let ## B=B_o e^{i (\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}- \omega t+\phi)} ##. And what you have should read ## B(r,t)=\frac{\vec{k} \times \vec{E}}{\omega} cos(\vec{k} \cdot \vec{r}-\omega t+\phi )##. The rest is straightforward.
 
Last edited:
Charles Link said:
Suggestion is to write the ## E ## field as ##E=\vec{ E}_o e^{i (\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}-\omega t +\phi)} ## and take the real part afterwards. Also, there is a vector calculus identity that ## \nabla \times (\psi \vec{a})=(\nabla \psi) \times \vec{a} +\psi (\nabla \times \vec{a}) ##. The operation then becomes doing a gradient on ## e^{i(\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}-\omega t )} ##. ## \\ ## And I think you have a typo: the second phase factor ## \phi ## should have a plus sign, like the first one. ## \\ ## Addition note: ## \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}=k_x x+k_y y+k_z z ##. You can readily compute the gradient in these Cartesian coordinates. ## \\ ## Additional suggestion: Let ## B=B_o e^{i (\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}- \omega t+\phi)} ##. And what you have should read ## B(r,t)=\frac{\vec{k} \times \vec{E}}{\omega} cos(\vec{k} \cdot \vec{r}-\omega t+\phi )##. The rest is straightforward.
Thank you, I should be able to take it from here.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top