Copper wire attached to the terminals of a cell

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a copper wire connected to a dry cell when influenced by a magnetic field from a nearby magnet. The original poster describes a scenario where the wire levitates due to the interaction between the current and the magnetic field, and poses a question about the effects of reversing both the magnet and the terminals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of reversing the magnet and terminals, referencing Fleming's Left Hand Rule. There are questions about how to apply this rule in the context of the problem, particularly regarding the direction of current and magnetic fields.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts involved, seeking clarification on the application of Fleming's Left Hand Rule. There is an acknowledgment of the known direction of current, but uncertainty remains regarding the force and magnetic field direction in the specific arrangements discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the direction of the magnetic field is not explicitly provided, which adds to the complexity of applying the rule to the problem at hand.

Masafi
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
A diagram shows a flexible copper wire attached to the terminals of a dry cell.

A strong circular magnet, 12 mm in diameter, is attached to the side of the cell. The interaction between the current in the wire and the magnetic field of the magnet causes the wire to levitate

i.e.
_____+
l
l [s n]
l____ -

The dashed and straight lines represents the copper wire attached to the 2 terminals, with a magnet attached in the middle of the cell.

Now the same thing is given, but the magnet reversed, as well as the terminals:

_____-
l
l [N S]
l____ +

Explain what would happen to the wire in the following arrangement.

The answer is:

Wire would levitate again
Two reversals cancel/applying Flemings Left Hand Rule

I don't understand what this means?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Masafi said:
Two reversals cancel/applying Flemings Left Hand Rule

I don't understand what this means?

Hi Masafi! :smile:

If you use the Left Hand Rule, and point two of your fingers in the opposite directions, your third finger will stay in the same place. :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
If you use the Left Hand Rule, and point two of your fingers in the opposite directions, your third finger will stay in the same place. :wink:

Thanks, so how do I apply that here? Which finger is pointing where?
 
You tell us

what is Flemings Left Hand Rule? :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
You tell us

what is Flemings Left Hand Rule? :smile:

I know what it is, but I don't get how you apply it here. The direction of current is known (+ to -) , but force and the direction in which B field applied is not given?

How does this relate to the previous arragement?

What I can think is using the direction of B field to be from N to S pole, so that would mean force acts down in the initial arrangment, as well as the 2nd one...
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K