Cost of Chemical Engineering vs Applied Physics Books

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the significant price disparity between Chemical Engineering (ChemE) and Applied Physics textbooks, with ChemE books often exceeding $100 while Applied Physics texts are typically priced between $20 and $30. This price difference is attributed to market dynamics, including the willingness of ChemE students to have their books covered by employers or taxpayers, as well as the perceived value of ChemE materials which often include practical examples alongside theoretical content. Despite the similarity in subject matter, such as fluid dynamics and mass/energy transfer, Applied Physics books tend to offer more in-depth theoretical insights. The conversation also touches on salary differences between ChemE and Mechanical Engineering (MechE), suggesting only a modest increase for ChemE graduates. Additionally, there are comments about the state of research in ChemE, with some expressing concerns about it being "overresearched," leading to extended timelines for graduate studies. The discussion highlights the complexities of pricing, market demand, and the academic landscape within engineering disciplines.
cronxeh
Gold Member
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
11
Why are all Chemical Engineering books at least a $100 or more, while Applied Physics books go for around 20-30 bucks a piece?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because Chemical Engineers know how to make money and Applied Physicists are in it for their own gratification.
 
I was told by a chem-e friend that chem-e's make more money than other engineers, and have shorter life spans (from inhaling all those chemicals).
 
yes well i switched from ChemE to MechE and the difference between the two is merely +5k for ChemE in salary a year.

The point about the books is that in both instances the material is practically the same - fluid dynamics, mass/energy transfer, etc. Yet applied physics books are cheap and have more in-depth theorital material, while ChemE books usually have examples with some theory, which isn't always even explained in terms of how it was achieved.
 
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/prod...urceid=1500000000000001827190&dest=9999999997

http://www.alibris.com/search/detail.cfm?chunk=25&mtype=&wtopic=Electrolyte%20solutions&qwork=5115282&S=R&bid=8165413227&pqtynew=0&page=1&matches=2&qsort=r

Couple classics in physical chemistry --- "kwitcher belly-aching." Book prices are set by what the market will bear, position on the best seller lists, and by publication "set-up" costs --- anything less than some minimum number printed really runs up the price --- chem Es never pay for books out of pocket (this is the assumption in pricing), employers buy the books, or the taxpayers cover the costs as "professional expenses" deductions. Best-sellers? Technical books are bestsellers?

H, C, & B (the green monster) is a classic --- the price reflects it --- $600? Yikes! I got to buy a "book vault." Harned & Owen? 'Nother classic. Out of print --- used to be an ACS "cash cow" --- got nicked sumpin' 'tween 50 - 100 bucks 30 years ago --- it hasn't appreciated quite as much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was talking to a guy who was doing graduate study in ChemE and he told me that ChemE is overresearched. Is there any truth to this?
 
This is more a question for academic and career guidance --- "overresearched?" That's what everyone says when the project vanishes around the corner in the toilet --- another 2-3 years work staring you in the face, digging out the literature, reading, getting back up to speed, equipment, apparatus construction/set-up, wrangling with the thesis committee, TAing for money, dumpster diving for food, furniture, and clothes ------ eevvveeerrrryyyyything is "overresearched."
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
69
Views
12K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
424
Back
Top