Coulomb's Law problem: Charged particles and the net electric field and force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving Coulomb's Law and the calculation of the charge q2 of particle 2 based on the forces acting on it from two other charged particles. The net electrostatic force on particle 2 is influenced by the position of particle 3, which is moved along the x-axis. Participants clarify that as particle 3 approaches infinity, the force on particle 2 is solely due to particle 1, equating to 0.8688 × 10^-25 N. There is confusion regarding the calculation of q2, as participants note that the final answer should be expressed as a multiple of the elementary charge e, rather than in terms of 1/e. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the charge units in the context of electrostatic calculations.
lydia_y620
Messages
8
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Figure (a) shows charged particles 1 and 2 that are fixed in place on an x axis. Particle 1 has a charge with a magnitude of |q1| = 19e. Particle 3 of charge q3 = +16e is initially on the x axis near particle 2.Then particle 3 is gradually moved in the positive direction of the x axis. As a result, the magnitude of the net electrostatic force on particle 2 due to particles 1 and 3 changes. Figure (b) gives the x component of that net force as a function of the position x of particle 3. The scale of the x axis is set by xs = 1.70 m. The plot has an asymptote of F2,net = 0.8688 × 10-25 N as x → ∞. As a multiple of e and including the sign, what is the charge q2 of particle 2?
upload_2017-1-31_1-36-40.png


Homework Equations


F = kq1q2/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


As x --> ∞, the force on particle 2 comes just from particle 1, so the force from particle 1 is always 0.8688 x 10^-25 N because particles 1 and 2 are stationary.
When x = 0.85 for particle 3, the net force on particle 2 is 0, so the force from particle 1 must equal the force from particle 3.
This means that 0.8688 x 10^-25 = k(q2*16e)/0.85^2
Is this correct? Apparently my answer is incorrect after I tried solving for q2 in terms of e.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-1-31_1-36-26.png
    upload_2017-1-31_1-36-26.png
    1.9 KB · Views: 1,087
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
lydia_y620 said:
1. Figure (a) shows charged particles 1 and 2 that are fixed in place on an x axis. Particle 1 has a charge with a magnitude of |q1| = 19e. Particle 3 of charge q3 = +16e is initially on the x axis near particle 2.Then particle 3 is gradually moved in the positive direction of the x axis. As a result, the magnitude of the net electrostatic force on particle 2 due to particles 1 and 3 changes. Figure (b) gives the x component of that net force as a function of the position x of particle 3. The scale of the x axis is set by xs = 1.70 m. The plot has an asymptote of F2,net = 0.8688 × 10-25 N as x → ∞. As a multiple of e and including the sign, what is the charge q2 of particle 2?
View attachment 112319

Homework Equations


F = kq1q2/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


As x --> ∞, the force on particle 2 comes just from particle 1, so the force from particle 1 is always 0.8688 x 10^-25 N because particles 1 and 2 are stationary.
When x = 0.85 for particle 3, the net force on particle 2 is 0, so the force from particle 1 must equal the force from particle 3.
This means that 0.8688 x 10^-25 = k(q2*16e)/0.85^2
Is this correct? Apparently my answer is incorrect after I tried solving for q2 in terms of e.[/B]
Please post your final answer.
I note that it asks for the charge as a multiple of e, but your last equation would naturally give a multiple of 1/e.
 
haruspex said:
Please post your final answer.
I note that it asks for the charge as a multiple of e, but your last equation would naturally give a multiple of 1/e.
My final answer was (4.359 x 10^-37)/e, which, like you've said, doesn't make sense because it's a multiple of 1/e.
 
lydia_y620 said:
My final answer was (4.359 x 10^-37)/e, which, like you've said, doesn't make sense because it's a multiple of 1/e.
It does make sense. It arises naturally from q1=Fr2/(kq2).
So express it as constant x e instead. e is a known value.
 
The checker is not taking it as that.
 
NSchool2000 said:
The checker is not taking it as that.
What checker is not taking what as what?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top