Coulomb's Law, Rearranging Equation.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Syncert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb's law Law
AI Thread Summary
To find the distance between two electrostatic point charges of +60 microCoulombs and +50 microCoulombs exerting a force of 175 N, the equation Fe = Kc (q1*q2/r^2) is used. Rearranging the equation leads to r^2 = Kc*q1*q2/Fe. Taking the square root of both sides gives the final formula R = √(Kc*q1*q2/Fe). This approach confirms that solving for r involves straightforward algebraic manipulation. The discussion highlights the simplicity of the rearrangement process in applying Coulomb's Law.
Syncert
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two electrostatic point charges of +60 microCoulombs and +50 microCoulombs exert a repulsive force on each other of 175 N. What is the distance between the two charges?


Homework Equations


Fe=Kc (q1*q2/r^2)


The Attempt at a Solution


I know I need to rearrange the equation, to get r^2 over to the other side of the equation. Do I have to square root both sides to figure this out?

Fe=Kc (q1*q2/r^2)
*r^2 * r^2

Fe*r^2 = Kc (q1*q2)
/Fe /Fe

R^2=Kc*q1*q2/Fe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Syncert! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)
Syncert said:
I know I need to rearrange the equation, to get r^2 over to the other side of the equation. Do I have to square root both sides to figure this out?

Fe=Kc (q1*q2/r^2)
*r^2 * r^2

Fe*r^2 = Kc (q1*q2)
/Fe /Fe

R^2=Kc*q1*q2/Fe

Yes, that's fine …

R = √(Kc*q1*q2/Fe) :smile:
 
Wow it was really that simple...thank you. =]
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top