Coupled Harmonic oscillator problem

Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
I need your help to solve this problem on coupled harmonic oscillators.

Two masses m1 and m2 are attached to two rigid supports by means of springs of force constants k1 and k2 respectively. The masses are connected to a third spring of force constant k3. The masses are free to move along the x-axis, assuming there is no damping. Set up the equations of motion for the system.

My work:

I suppose the third spring is connected in between the two masses.
Equation for first mass is:
m_1\ddot{x} = -k_1x
Equation for second mass is:
m_2\ddot{x} = -k_2x

Now please help me proceed to setup the equation for the 2 connected masses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what you did didnt seem to cosnider the third spring
let it be in this order
k1 m1 k3 m2 k2 (thats how the steup would be, I am too lazy to draw a diagram)
suppose m1 was moved right or left) by some amount x1 then m2 may also move some amount x2 right?
i don't think it is necessary for x1 = x2.
so your equation is now (if i took the left direction to be positive)
m \ddot{x} = k_{1}x_{1} + k_{3}(x_{2}-x_{1})
m \ddot{x} = k_{2}x_{2} + k_{3}(x_{2}-x_{1})

thats my two cents
i think they may be a problem with the signs...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top