COVID COVID-19 Coronavirus Containment Efforts

AI Thread Summary
Containment efforts for the COVID-19 Coronavirus are facing significant challenges, with experts suggesting that it may no longer be feasible to prevent its global spread. The virus has a mortality rate of approximately 2-3%, which could lead to a substantial increase in deaths if it becomes as widespread as the flu. Current data indicates around 6,000 cases, with low mortality rates in areas with good healthcare. Vaccine development is underway, but it is unlikely to be ready in time for the current outbreak, highlighting the urgency of the situation. As the outbreak evolves, the healthcare system may face considerable strain, underscoring the need for continued monitoring and response efforts.
  • #1,551
kyphysics said:
Call me cynical, but I don't believe ANYTHING about cases and deaths coming from China!

Why do you doubt China's statistics? The WHO visited China and were able to see their practices for themselves.
https://www.who.int/docs/default-so...na-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf

Here is a webinar by Dale Fisher, a member of the WHO team that visited China. He talks about what they did when they visited China. @bhobba: Dale Fisher is Australian.
https://medicine.nus.edu.sg/cet/webinar/#show

China is now helping Italy.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/dip...ds-team-medical-experts-gear-help-italy-fight
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...tself-as-a-leader-in-tackling-the-coronavirus
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #1,552
kyphysics said:
Call me cynical, but I don't believe ANYTHING about cases and deaths coming from China!
Among the hospitalized cases their statistics is ~ in sync with the available data from US.
The rate of non-hospitalized cases is a big-big question everywhere and actually the biggest liar about this will be from Europa, as it seems...
 
  • Like
Likes wukunlin
  • #1,553
nsaspook said:
IDENTIFYING CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE DURING COVID-19
That's a very useful link. Thanks for sharing. I'm sure it will become a discussion topic before long, and we can use that as a jumping off point.

Of course if the lockdown lasts for 18 months as some sources say, then all the people with non-essential jobs will run out of money and solving that becomes critical.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, bhobba and nsaspook
  • #1,554
chirhone said:
What years or centuries ago did the flu become pandemic? And before people got immuned to it. Did it also overwhelm the US health system then requiring this flattening the curve?
LOL. There was no US health system centuries ago.
 
  • #1,555
There was no US by the time influenza evolved. The ancient Greeks had descriptions of the flu, over 2000 years ago, and the disease might be much older.

CDC has a histogram of symptom onset - basically the same approach as I posted for China a while ago. These numbers are very incomplete, but they show the same general picture. Cases come much earlier than confirmed cases. The US had 100 new people showing symptoms (not just being infected!) on March 2. At that time the US had 57 confirmed cases. And these 100 are just people who were confirmed to have the virus later.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba, Evo and anorlunda
  • #1,556
I haven't been in one of my offices for over two weeks. Today, my boss called me to say that there was a confirmed case in the building (one floor below ours) and that I might need to come into take care of a code problem. Really. :oldeyes:
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #1,557
atyy said:
So Wuhan's experience gives hope that Italy can succeed, and that the US need not follow Italy's experience if they continue to aggressively impose social distancing measures.
There's still hope. ITALY must radically reinforce confinement in all areas, they haven't done this everywhere! Incredible!
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
  • #1,558
kyphysics said:
The problem is that lots of American youth brazenly don't care and even say they WILL NOT SOCIAL DISTANCE
Not just youth, see the Washington Post article (March 19) quoted here.
 
  • #1,559
atyy said:
Why do you doubt China's statistics? The WHO visited China and were able to see their practices for themselves.
https://www.who.int/docs/default-so...na-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf

Here is a webinar by Dale Fisher, a member of the WHO team that visited China. He talks about what they did when they visited China. @bhobba: Dale Fisher is Australian.
https://medicine.nus.edu.sg/cet/webinar/#show

China is now helping Italy.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/dip...ds-team-medical-experts-gear-help-italy-fight
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...tself-as-a-leader-in-tackling-the-coronavirus
Is WHO, itself, free from corruption? I vaguely (could be wrong) recall reading somewhere that China had controlling influence over it, from having board members situated with them or something like that.

My lack of trust in China comes from their early suppression of the cases in Wuhan and history of repression of "bad facts" that don't make their country look good to the outside world. The people of China are innocent. But their government is corrupt and always controls the news narratives about what is going on inside the nation.

My question is why would anyone trust anything the Chinese government says? Can we verify for sure China's success in dealing with the virus post-cover-up? If it's verifiable, okay, I concede. But if we're talking about just trusting their numbers without direct proof, then I feel I have the right to be suspicious.
 
  • #1,560
I have a question about testing and risk.

I assume that the current tests are all looking for the virus itself and that there aren't any tests for antibodies once you've recovered. With some cases described as being so mild that people didn't even know that they were sick, an antibody test would eventually be needed to see who is still at risk while we're still waiting for a vaccine. If someone who has recovered is immune and can no longer spread the virus, would they be able to get back to their normal lives without risk to others?

If it's been mentioned already, sorry that I haven't read through 63 pages of posts. :bugeye:
 
  • #1,561
Local retail stores are reducing hours. Seems like that's the wrong direction - this increases rather than decreases customer density.
 
  • Like
Likes mattt
  • #1,562
---- Staff Notice ----

Although this thread in in general discussion, it's nature is very sensitive. We want this thread to remain as an outlet for communication in these trying times. For that to happen all members must do their best to use highly regarded sources and to not spread conspiracy, knee-jerk reactions or unhelpful opinions. We will be thread banning those who aren't complying. Look after each other. Do what is in the best interest of our online community and the world.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD, Klystron, nsaspook and 10 others
  • #1,563
Borg said:
I have a question about testing and risk.

I assume that the current tests are all looking for the virus itself and that there aren't any tests for antibodies once you've recovered. With some cases described as being so mild that people didn't even know that they were sick, an antibody test would eventually be needed to see who is still at risk while we're still waiting for a vaccine. If someone who has recovered is immune and can no longer spread the virus, would they be able to get back to their normal lives without risk to others?

If it's been mentioned already, sorry that I haven't read through 63 pages of posts. :bugeye:
Right now PCR is the gold standard for testing (not whole virus culture). There is some talk about development of immunoassay testing, but as far as I know, it hasn’t left the lab yet (apparently there’s a lot of antibody cross-reactivity with other coronaviruses). Here’s the WHO guide on testing:
https://www.who.int/emergencies/dis...s-2019/technical-guidance/laboratory-guidance
 
  • Like
Likes atyy, Borg and BillTre
  • #1,564
atyy said:
Although Wuhan was mismanaged early in the outbreak and had a terrible experience, overall it suggests amazingly that even such obstacles can be overcome. China has reported no new infections arising from within for two days in a row (new cases are from travellers coming in from other countries). Currently only about 1% of Wuhan's population has been infected. So Wuhan's experience gives hope that Italy can succeed, and that the US need not follow Italy's experience if they continue to aggressively impose social distancing measures.
What is most amazing to me is that Wuhan seems to have exported COV-19 throughout the globe, but not throughout the rest of China. I'm guessing this speaks to the relative immobility of people compared to those in most other countries.
 
  • Like
Likes mattt, DennisN and BillTre
  • #1,565
Vanadium 50 said:
Local retail stores are reducing hours. Seems like that's the wrong direction - this increases rather than decreases customer density.

Could be that they need more time to disinfect. Or maybe they need a window of time long enough for the virus to die on the surfaces between closing and opening? Stores are also commonly opening early just for seniors now.
 
  • #1,566
TeethWhitener said:
Right now PCR is the gold standard for testing (not whole virus culture). There is some talk about development of immunoassay testing, but as far as I know, it hasn’t left the lab yet (apparently there’s a lot of antibody cross-reactivity with other coronaviruses). Here’s the WHO guide on testing:

https://www.who.int/emergencies/dis...s-2019/technical-guidance/laboratory-guidance

There are some lab-developed immunoassays to detect antibodies against the COVID-19 virus, for example, two days ago, scientists just released a pre-print describing their new immunoassay test: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.17.20037713v1

For a popular press summary see: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...es-could-show-true-scale-coronavirus-pandemic

The immunoassay test, while potentially useful for diagnostic purposes, would also be useful to get a handle on how many undiagnosed cases there may have been, which individuals in a population should be immune to the virus, and how long that immunity lasts.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Borg, atyy, OmCheeto and 1 other person
  • #1,567
russ_watters said:
What is most amazing to me is that Wuhan seems to have exported COV-19 throughout the globe, but not throughout the rest of China. I'm guessing this speaks to the relative immobility of people compared to those in most other countries.
China Will Rack Up Three Billion Trips During World’s Biggest Human Migration
Bloomberg News
19 January 2020
Gung hay fat choy!
icchinarail270217.jpg
 
  • #1,568
My daughter- in- law who works in a local hospital here in FL says they just received the test kits today but will not be able to start testing for five days. She says that the test result will probably not be available for 5 -10 days. People using the physicians affiliated with this hospital may wait two weeks to get results. Meanwhile, students are partying on the beaches exchanging bodily fluids and in a week or so will disperse across the country to bring home a present to their parents and relatives. The current increase of new cases is 33% per day which means at this rate 370,000 cases by 4/1. Only 2 of 5 people say they will avoid crowds. It is only going to get worse. Hang on to your hats.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes russ_watters, Evo, bhobba and 2 others
  • #1,569
Vanadium 50 said:
Local retail stores are reducing hours. Seems like that's the wrong direction - this increases rather than decreases customer density.

It depends. In Singapore, many retail stores reduced their hours because customer density had dropped already, ie. not enough customers to warrant opening long hours. Community spread here was detected around 7 Feb. The first week after that, I recall restaurants were almost empty, but things recovered a bit a couple of weeks later. But even with the improvement, it seems that business was still about 50% less.
 
  • #1,571
russ_watters said:
What is most amazing to me is that Wuhan seems to have exported COV-19 throughout the globe, but not throughout the rest of China. I'm guessing this speaks to the relative immobility of people compared to those in most other countries.

Wuhan did export the virus to all provinces of China. However, various measures were taken throughout China to slow the spread of the infection. Unfortunately, insufficient measures were taken in other parts of the world. @OmCheeto had some posts earlier in this thread about cases in other parts of China. The death rate outside Hubei, where Wuhan is, is lower. But one of the interesting things @OmCheeto noticed was that Guangdong and Zhejiang seemed to have even lower death rates than other non-Hubei provinces. I think the death rate in Guangdong has risen since then, but Zhejiang is on track to have 1 death in about 1200 cases (but they still have 14 active cases, some of the more recent cases are imported from Italy)

Current statistics in various parts of China:
https://www.statista.com/statistics...and-suspected-wuhan-coronavirus-cases-region/

By Jan 30 all provinces of China had cases
https://www.businessinsider.sg/wuhan-coronavirus-spread-every-region-china-2020-1?r=US&IR=T

Mentions various measures that were taken throughout China
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-curbs-many-report-no-new-cases-idUSKCN20I0F2

Many new cases in China are imported (eg. Chinese citizens returning from Europe)
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...-surge-infected-arrivals-200304062507995.html
http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-03/03/c_138838575.htm
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #1,572
Rive said:
I don't know about that, but garlic - especially if eaten raw - can be a great help with social distancing.
:oldlaugh:
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #1,576
I am following this website for the Covid 19 tally at https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
In the last few days the daily increase in new cases has risen to about 40% compared to 33% for the week before. US cases today are at 19,383 with 256 deaths and counting at 8 EDT.

Breaking News. My son who lives in Easton MD. on the Eastern Shore of the Chesapeake Bay just sent me pictures of many military tanks arriving by rail. Easton does have a National Guard Armory. Does this mean anything?
 
  • #1,577
Mortality 256/19383 ≈ 1.5 %. Worse than Germans, better than Italians
 
  • #1,578
atyy said:
Wuhan did export the virus to all provinces of China.
Yup. Of the 31* locales with over 500 cases, Chinese provinces account for 1/3 of them(11).

However, various measures were taken throughout China to slow the spread of the infection. Unfortunately, insufficient measures were taken in other parts of the world. @OmCheeto had some posts earlier in this thread about cases in other parts of China. The death rate outside Hubei, where Wuhan is, is lower. But one of the interesting things @OmCheeto noticed was that Guangdong and Zhejiang seemed to have even lower death rates than other non-Hubei provinces. I think the death rate in Guangdong has risen since then, but Zhejiang is on track to have 1 death in about 1200 cases (but they still have 14 active cases, some of the more recent cases are imported from Italy)

Thanks for reminding me about this.
Almost every other day I notice something interesting, but I missed this trend:

Screen Shot 2020-03-20 at 5.39.06 PM.png

Between February 18th and March 3rd, Chinese CFR's nearly flat-lined.
Current statistics ...

Sorry, but I didn't check out a single one of your links.
There's just too much maths and graphing to be done.

I suspect the wide "global" disparity in case fatality rates might be due to countries/locales being overwhelmed.

Screen Shot 2020-03-20 at 5.50.17 PM.png

Not sure what's going on with Germany.
------

* 2020.03.17
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog and atyy
  • #1,579
One of the clubs here threw a quarantine themed party. Local businesses are struggling, but the strip club is still drawing customers. People have their priorities in order here.
 
  • Haha
Likes bhobba and DennisN
  • #1,580
atyy said:
Why do you doubt China's statistics? The WHO visited China and were able to see their practices for themselves.
https://www.who.int/docs/default-so...na-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf

Here's one reason to be weary of data from China. An excerpt from the excellent issue of The Economist released yesterday:

THE FLOW of information is essential to curbing a pandemic. Yet on March 17th China took a dramatic step towards throttling it. Xi Jinping’s government ordered American journalists for the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal to leave the country, in the biggest expulsion of Western correspondents from China since the Communist takeover in 1949. The world sorely needs objective reporting on the place with the longest experience of fighting covid-19. China, too, lacks objective reporting about the virus or any other sensitive topic.
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2020/03/21/expelling-journalists-is-no-way-to-fight-a-pandemic

This of course could have happened for many reasons; it may not directly (or even indirectly) relate to the current batch of statistics. For example: opportunism for the party to extend its reach domestically, and better stage manage its portrayal internationally (perhaps with an eye toward after the pandemic).

Nevertheless, if you play 'poker' and see someone 'raise' like this, you should have a material amount of skepticism about their cards.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #1,581
OmCheeto said:
I suspect the wide "global" disparity in case fatality rates might be due to countries/locales being overwhelmed.
Possible
 
  • #1,582
re China throwing out reporters: (can't find original post, referenced in post 1580 by @StoneTemplePython)

re China throwing out reporters:
IIRC, at the time, it was reported that they were rather upset about the US President insisting on calling it the Chinese Flu or Chinese Virus. So they effectively said 'If you are going to be that obnoxious, F*** Off and get out.'

Just as many of use would do with a visitor to our home!
That doesn't make the lack of information any more pleasant, just understandable.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes sysprog
  • #1,583
StoneTemplePython said:
Here's one reason to be weary of data from China. An excerpt from the excellent issue of The Economist released yesterday:https://www.economist.com/leaders/2020/03/21/expelling-journalists-is-no-way-to-fight-a-pandemic

This of course could have happened for many reasons; it may not directly (or even indirectly) relate to the current batch of statistics. For example: opportunism for the party to extend its reach domestically, and better stage manage its portrayal internationally (perhaps with an eye toward after the pandemic).

Nevertheless, if you play 'poker' and see someone 'raise' like this, you should have a material amount of skepticism about their cards.
I have lived in China for about 5 years. Looking at it from their point of view, foreign journalists, especially from USA, have a track record amplifying or twisting the negatives, even making things up out of thin air, and disregarding everything positive as propaganda. With this outbreak, nothing has changed, a whole bunch of journalists took this opportunity to make up fictional horror stories. I know they are made up because I am seeing things right here with my own eyes. In this case, the Chinese government finally had enough.

I will believe the data in China are real unless proved otherwise. Disregarding everything "because China," in my opinion, is simply prejudice.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Irishdoug, Ryan_m_b, mattt and 4 others
  • #1,584
wukunlin said:
I will believe the data in China are real unless proved otherwise.

It may be that this issue is too politically dangerous for people residing in China to meaningfully participate on this thread.

Incidentally we know that Iran has been cooking the data for covid19 infections and deaths (I can cite exact issue of More or Less podcast if people want a source.) With China we don't really know either way. Like I said the biggest expulsion of foreign journalists since Mao's takeover is cause for some skepticism.
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog
  • #1,585
StoneTemplePython said:
It may be that this issue is too politically dangerous for people residing in China to meaningfully participate on this thread.
This is the sort of exaggeration I'm talking about. The most immediate danger I have right now is from a PF mentor giving me warning for talking too much politics in PF
 
  • Like
Likes Ryan_m_b, bhobba and sysprog
  • #1,586
gleem said:
Breaking News. My son who lives in Easton MD. on the Eastern Shore of the Chesapeake Bay just sent me pictures of many military tanks arriving by rail. Easton does have a National Guard Armory. Does this mean anything?
From The Hill - " Tens of thousands of National Guard troops could be activated in states across the country in the next several weeks to help deal with the Coronavirus pandemic, the head of the National Guard said Thursday. "
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/...s-of-thousands-of-national-guard-troops-could
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...used-to-assist-with-coronavirus-idUSKBN2163F3

Governor Cuomo has called out National Guard units in NY for support. I've heard units in Washington State have been activated.
March 18, 2020 - "LATHAM, N.Y. – A week into a mission to help contain the spread of the COVID-19 coronavirus, the New York National Guard had 900 personnel on duty from Long Island to New York City to the Albany area March 17."
https://www.nationalguard.mil/News/...k-national-guard-members-respond-to-covid-19/

Tanks are not part of the NG deployment. I've seen tanks moved by train, which saves using individual trucks and fuel. As far as I know, tanks are not deployed in the US, although there are bases where they are used for training.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,587
Rive said:
Lockdown kills the flu.

Of course, and more efficiently than Coronovirirus because on average it has a lower R0 of about 1.7, but varies with strain and communal setting. Coronovirus is the same in that it varies with communal setting, but is thought to on the average have an R0 of about 2.3 - higher than the flu. As mentioned it varies with communal setting - if you have lockdown you reinfect very few people, and the R0 goes well below 1, in which case it simply dies out. Those into math can solve the differential equation, see its exponential with an index depending on R0 and time. The higher the R0 the faster it explodes, below 1 it simply dies out. Thats the idea of all the measures (eg social distancing, no handshakes etc) we are taking - is to lower the R0 and reduce spread. Lockdown is the ultimate reduction - and will kill it off.

Thats all fine and dandy, you may even say fantastic, but here is the rub. Maintaining the lockdown, force will usually be needed - China was literally forced to weld people into their buildings on occasion. Managing the economic consequences - that can easily be in the trillions - you know what they say - a trillion here, a trillion there and pretty soon you are talking real money. Plus it can never be 100% effective - people have to get food, see doctors if they fall and break bones etc etc. Then exactly what happens once the lockdown is over - will it simply come back again. In reality you can't keep it up for extended periods - its purpose is to buy time to get other measures in place such as distribution of the anti malarial drug that has proven to be effective against it and, fingers crossed, get a vaccine.

The better solution it to go hard and early like Singapore etc did - Italy is the extreme example of not doing that. Other countries are somewhat in the middle. I would say Australia is between the USA and Singapore, but IMHO even it was too slow. That is now being fixed - we had a spike in cases just after our boarders were closed, but fingers crossed over the last 3 days the increase in cases was declining - 50, 40, 37 in Queensland. But some nut case let 2700 people off a cruise ship in New South Wales:
https://www.thechronicle.com.au/news/2700-passengers-let-off-infected-sydney-cruise-shi/3976794/

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes atyy and sysprog
  • #1,588
atyy said:
The death rate outside Hubei, where Wuhan is, is lower. But one of the interesting things @OmCheeto noticed was that Guangdong and Zhejiang seemed to have even lower death rates than other non-Hubei provinces. I think the death rate in Guangdong has risen since then, but Zhejiang is on track to have 1 death in about 1200 cases (but they still have 14 active cases, some of the more recent cases are imported from Italy)
What I see in Guangdong and Zhejiang is that their cases are more concentrated, with Guandong almost all cases are in Guangzhou and Shenzhen, in fact all cities of Guangdong in the leaderboard are in the Pearl River Delta. These cities are relatively wealthy and have access better healthcare comparing most other Chinese cities. Almost all cases in Zhejiang are concentrated in Wenzhou, where they eventually implemented Hubei-style lockdown. With the rest of Zhejiang having few numbers of cases, the resources of the province (also a wealthy one at that) can be poured to helping Wenzhou.
With other provinces in China, those are either the poorer ones or cases are spread out too widely.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, bhobba and atyy
  • #1,589
Jarvis323 said:
It would seem like a fairly trivial thing for some like Elon Musk to put his vast resources towards this.

Well Bill Gates did donate $100 million and has been warning about it for years:


He is also good friends with Warren Buffet who basically has, like Bill Gates himself, pledged his entire fortune to the Bill Gates Foundation. Together they are the richest people on earth.

We did not listen, yet these people are now, basically pledging their entire fortune to save humanity. Some speak of the greedy rich - my eyes often roll back at that - yes there are some greedy rich - but certainly not all - not by a long shot.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron, Astronuc, mattt and 3 others
  • #1,590
bhobba said:
Well Bill Gates did donate $100 million and has been warning about it for years:


He is also good friends with Warren Buffet who basically has, like Bill Gates himself, pledged his entire fortune to the Bill Gates Foundation. Together they are the richest people on earth.

We did not listen, yet these people are now, basically pledging their entire fortune to save humanity. Some speak of the greedy rich - my eyes often roll back at that - yes there are some greedy rich - but certainly not all - not by a long shot.

Thanks
Bill

That's true, but I just hope it translates to help solving a very time sensitive issue. One millions dollars is really nothing compared to the money the federal government has, but time after time we see them too little and too late. We need things immediately, so besides money it requires initiative, and innovation.

We should also thank Jack Ma. He has donated 1,000,000 masks and 500,000 test kits to the US, and similar amounts to Europe, Japan, Africa, Iran, and many other countries.
 
  • Like
Likes mattt, bhobba and BillTre
  • #1,591
China has reported no new cases due to community spread for 2 days (new cases are arrivals from other countries). If this can be sustained for 14 days, they may gradually lift the lockdown in Wuhan, though many other measures will remain in place.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/wuhans-new-virus-cases-set-to-dry-up/news-story/2a9aa90cf0d8c22fe514f52b28d0dddb
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...s-could-cease-by-mid-late-march-idUSKBN21608U

Interestingly to me the article cites remarks by Li Lanjuan, director of China’s State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases. This seems to be in Zhejiang. https://www.zju.edu.cn/english/2018/0520/c19974a812273/page.htm

Is that a contributor to why Zhejiang has so far managed to keep their death rate low (currently 1 death in about 1200 cases, with 14 active cases)?
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #1,592
Jarvis323 said:
One millions dollars is really nothing compared to the money the federal government has
Yes, even $100 million, which is what it was, is far less than the government is likely to contribute, but it's still a lot of money.
 
  • Like
Likes Jarvis323 and bhobba
  • #1,593
chirhone said:
Flu is widespread only in cold places. Wuhan, UK? But I think Iran is always summer? So COVID-19 explosion in poplution indeed knows no climate?

In north Queensland its tropical and they get the flu just as bad as anywhere else in Australia - even in summer. I got flu in the summer down in Canberra, which can be cold, but at that time was getting 40 degree Celsius days. Flu is not a respecter of hot or cold. During cold weather you tend, in more temperate climates, to be more indoors and closer together, so tropical places do not have it as bad - but people visiting from where its cold imports it and you still get a spike during winter.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #1,594
Borg said:
I haven't been in one of my offices for over two weeks. Today, my boss called me to say that there was a confirmed case in the building (one floor below ours) and that I might need to come into take care of a code problem. Really. :oldeyes:

IT managers, don't you love em. I was told by a friend their place of employ had the view managing was the same regardless of what is managed and in put a non IT person to manage them. They left on stress leave after 3 months because they could not understand why the tech people kept on saying you can't do that.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes Borg
  • #1,595
Regarding the deployment of the National Guard:
Though the governor has activated the Illinois National Guard to help combat the virus, the service members will have no role in enforcing any potential order. Pritzker said irresponsible social media users, as well as Russian and Chinese meddlers, spread unfounded rumors about the Guard being deployed to enforce a quarantine.

In reality, 60 service members will be used to establish drive-up testing sites, help with food delivery to disadvantaged families impacted by school closures and possibly prepare closed hospitals to reopen. The vast majority of currently activated troops are health care professionals — doctors, nurses, medical technicians — who would not be tapped for a law-enforcement assignment.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/coro...0200320-teedakbfw5gvdgmnaxlel54hau-story.html

See also https://www.chicagotribune.com/coro...0200320-fs6neznkx5hindebnwmwsjlyc4-story.html

As trains transporting military tanks and Humvees traveled through the Chicago area the past few days, rumors took root on social media that the Illinois National Guard would play a role in imposing the directive.

The Guard quickly shot it down.

“Those (tanks and Humvees) are not ours,” said Lt. Col. Bradford Leighton of the Illinois National Guard. “The military moves equipment all the time by train. If we were to move, we wouldn’t be doing it by train. We would drive.”
 
  • #1,596
kadiot said:
There's still hope. ITALY must radically reinforce confinement in all areas, they haven't done this everywhere! Incredible!

Yes. They bought Chinese experts in who told them exactly that - your containment measures are FAR too lax.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
  • #1,597
Keith_McClary said:
Not just youth, see the Washington Post article (March 19) quoted here.

Same in Australia.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #1,598
atyy said:
Unfortunately, insufficient measures were taken in other parts of the world.

Exactly. Here in Aus we had our first case in January on the Gold Coast with a Chinese tourist. If we took action then we would be in much better shape now. But Australia was largely spared from SARS and didn't take it seriously enough. Singapore did.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #1,599
Mondayman said:
One of the clubs here threw a quarantine themed party. Local businesses are struggling, but the strip club is still drawing customers. People have their priorities in order here.

I do not know if here in Brisbane we are taking it more or less seriously - the strip clubs are basically not attracting any patronage, but we are going to the beach and ignoring social distancing in droves. Beats me.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #1,600
bhobba said:
I do not know if here in Brisbane we are taking it more or less seriously - the strip clubs are basically not attracting any patronage, but we are going to the beach and ignoring social distancing in droves. Beats me.

Standing and swimming 2m apart at the beach?
 

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
516
Views
35K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top