Current through an Inductor in an RL circuit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of current through an inductor in an RL circuit, specifically focusing on the calculation of the current \( i_0(t) \) after a switch is closed. The context includes homework-related problem-solving and circuit analysis techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an equation for \( i_0(t) \) and describes their initial approach to the problem, including the use of Ohm's law and Kirchhoff's Current Law.
  • The same participant expresses uncertainty about their calculated current \( i_0 \) being -445 Amps, suggesting a potential error in their analysis.
  • Another participant acknowledges an omission of a resistor in their initial drawing, indicating a correction to their previous work.
  • Further posts include attempts to simplify the circuit and questions about how to handle the dependent current source in the analysis.
  • Final calculations presented by the participant yield values for \( V(\phi) \) and \( i_0 \) as 44.4V and -395.2A, respectively, but the participant seeks guidance on reducing the circuit.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion reflects uncertainty and potential errors in calculations, with no consensus reached on the correct approach or final values for the current and voltage. Multiple competing views on circuit reduction and handling of dependent sources are present.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the implications of their calculations, and there are missing assumptions regarding the circuit configuration and the role of the dependent current source.

maxpound18
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find i0(t) see attached picture

Homework Equations



io(t) = iinfinite + (i0- - iinfinite)e-Rt/L

The Attempt at a Solution



I first re-drew the diagram for when the switch has NOT been closed, which is esssentially the same thing without the 37.5 V Source and the adjacent 10 ohm resistor.

I then found V(phi) using ohms law since the current through both the resistors should be the same. The current is (i=V/R) which is (250/50= 5 Amps)
So, V(phi) = iR which is (5amps*10ohms = 50 V)

I then applied Kirkchoff's Current Law to the node between the inductor, the dependent source, and the 10 ohm resistor.
0 = -(250/50) + 9V(phi) + i0
0 = -5 + 9V(phi) + i0
0 = -5 + 9(50) + i0
i0 = -445 Amps (This seems wrong) but moving on...then i drew the diagram for when t > 0
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0233.jpg
    IMAG0233.jpg
    9.3 KB · Views: 512
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry i left out a resistor.

THIS is the correct drawing
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0235.jpg
    IMAG0235.jpg
    13.7 KB · Views: 481
For when t > 0

here are source conversions.
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0236.jpg
    IMAG0236.jpg
    16.9 KB · Views: 478
and more conversions
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0238.jpg
    IMAG0238.jpg
    23.7 KB · Views: 456
My question at this point is how do I reduce THIS circuit down to one resistor with the inductor? And what am i supposed to do with the Dependent Current Source.

The values I calculated for V(phi) and i0 are 44.4V and -395.2A respectively.
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0239.jpg
    IMAG0239.jpg
    22.4 KB · Views: 492

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
987
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K