How Do Concave Mirrors Form Real or Virtual Images?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mmg0789
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concave Mirrors
AI Thread Summary
Concave mirrors can form either real or virtual images depending on the object's distance from the mirror. A real image is produced when the image distance (d_i) is positive, while a virtual image occurs when d_i is negative. The magnification also indicates the type of image; a positive magnification suggests a virtual image, while a negative magnification indicates a real image. Additionally, real images can be larger than the object but will be inverted. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately predicting image formation in concave mirrors.
mmg0789
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
how can you tell when the image will become real or virtual in a concave mirror, the distance?..i'm not sure

thanks in advance

*edit*
oh i think i know..is it the magnification, if the magnification is more than 1 then that means its virtual since it would be upright and a bigger image

is that right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is correct;
mmg0789 said:
how can you tell when the image will become real or virtual in a concave mirror, the distance?

Using the standar equation for a mirror;

\frac{1}{d_{O}} + \frac{1}{d_{i}} = \frac{1}{f}

When d_{i} is positive, the image is real; if it is negative the image is virtual. d_{i} is the horizontal displacement of the image from the centre of the mirror. d_{O} is the horizontal displacement of the object from the centre of the mirror and f is the focal length of the mirror (which is positive for a concave mirror).

It is possible it have a real image that is larger than the object. What is the definition of a real and virtual image?

More information is available here;
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/mirray.html#c3
 
Actually if the magnification is +ve , the image is virtual.
-ve->real
(As per new Cartesian sign convention)
 
arunbg said:
Actually if the magnification is +ve , the image is virtual.
-ve->real
(As per new Cartesian sign convention)

I agree, that's why I said above
Hootenanny said:
t is possible it have a real image that is larger than the object.

I did forget to mention however, that the image would be inverted.

~H
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top