Cylindrical resonance cavity problem

danielakkerma
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
Hello all!

Homework Statement


Consider a cylindrical cavity with length "d" and radius "a". Find the corresponding electric field, and the dispersion relation therein.

Homework Equations


Maxwell's equations.

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to solve the appropriate vector Helmholtz equation(obtained by assuming harmonic time-dependence of the waves in the cavity).
Within the cylinder, one arrives at(where: \vec{E}=\vec{E_0}(r, \varphi, z)e^{-i \omega t})
<br /> \vec{\nabla}^2 \vec{E_0} = \frac{\omega^2}{c^2} \vec{E_0}<br />
However, since \vec{E_0} = E_r \hat{r} + E_\varphi \hat{\varphi} + E_z \hat{z}, the Laplacian becomes far more convoluted in the cylindrical form.
Solving for Ez is not that difficult(with appropriate separation of variables).
However, how does one find E_r, E_phi?
After all, solving for the wave equation for the r, phi components involves:
<br /> (\vec{\nabla}^2 \vec{E_0})_r = \vec{\nabla}^2 E_r - \frac{1}{r^2}(E_r + 2\frac{\partial E_{\varphi}}{\partial \varphi})<br />
However, this equation for E_r requires E_phi; and obviously, the components of E_r are not necessarily identical to E_phi, so substituting one for the other(through analogous separation of variables for both) is impossible here.
Without making any other assumptions(or simplifications; for instance, I managed to simplify the problem greatly if I assumed complete azimuthal symmetry(i.e. E_phi = 0 & d/dphi =0)), is there any way to obtain an exact solution for this? Where should I turn to, next?
Thank you for your attention,
Reliant on your help,
Daniel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Going to have to bump this; is this at all solvable?
 
Bump

Bumping again.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top