Damped Harmonic Oscillator Using Greens Theorem

dacruick
Messages
1,038
Reaction score
1
Hi there,

I just started an intermediate classical mechanics course at university and was smacked upside the head with this question that I don't know how to even start.

Homework Statement


We are to find the response function of a damped harmonic oscillator given a Forcing function. The forcing function for t>0 is
F(t) = F(0)exp(-λt)*sin(wt)

where λ is a constant, F(0) is the initial force, w is the angular frequency, and t is time.

Homework Equations


The equation of motion of a damped harmonic oscillator which I believe to be
x'' + 2bx' + wo2x = F(t)

The Attempt at a Solution


I haven't really even attempted this solution. I've been looking online for a direction, and I saw one example that told me to guess a particular solution based on the forcing functions proportionality to eiwt. It doesn't tell me why I should be doing that, and to be honest, I don't even really understand what Greens theorem is.

Any help would be very greatly appreciated,

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you had a course in differential equations? You have a linear equation with constant coefficients. It's straightforward to solve using the method of undetermined coefficients. So you should be able to find the solution even if it's not using the method you're supposed to.

Am I right in assuming when you refer to Green's theorem, you mean that you're supposed to find the solution to the differential equation by finding the Green's function for the linear operator?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top