Damped oscillator consecutive amplitude ratio

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of consecutive maximum amplitudes for a damped oscillator, given its angular frequency and the period of an undamped oscillator. The user calculates the damped angular frequency and attempts to derive the ratio using the equation for damped motion, focusing on maximum amplitudes while disregarding the sine function. They express uncertainty about the values of the damping constant and the maximum amplitudes, seeking clarification and assistance. The user references the logarithmic decrement formula and arrives at an approximate value of 0.243, but questions its accuracy compared to a provided answer of 0.21. The thread highlights the complexities of damped oscillation calculations and the need for precise parameters.
Uniquebum
Messages
53
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Undamped oscillator's period T_0 = 12s. Damped oscillator's angular frequency \omega_1 = \omega_0 * 97\% where \omega_0 is the angular frequency of the undamped oscillator's. What is the ratio of consecutive maximum amplitudes?

Homework Equations


Equation of damped oscillator's motion:
x = e^{-\alpha t}A_0sin(\omega_1 t + \phi)
where \alpha = \frac{b}{2m} where b =damping constant.


The Attempt at a Solution


Firstly, were' talking about maximums so we can disregard the sin() function.
Calculating \omega_1 = \omega_0 * 0.97 = \frac{2\pi}{T_0}0.97.
Thus for the damped oscillator T_1 = \frac{T_0}{0.97}

Then we could write something as follows:
\frac{x_0}{x_1} = \frac{e^{-\alpha t_0}A_0}{e^{-\alpha t_1}A_0}
but we have no clue of alpha nor about x_0 and x_1... Any help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I ended up using the formula

\zeta = \sqrt{1-(\frac{\omega_1}{\omega_0})^2}
And got approx 0.243 out of it. In my answer spreadsheet they claim the answer to be 0.21 however. Now I'm wondering whether i got it right or not... heh :) Thanks for the help either way.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
964
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
807
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K