DC motor - Enough torque to rotate load?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around selecting a suitable DC motor to rotate a 200-gram cylinder vertically, with a focus on torque and coupling options. A 2.1W 6V DC motor with a 50:1 gearbox provides 12.5Ncm of torque, which is sufficient for the load, especially considering the cylinder's inertia. The motor's integrated gearing increases torque, making it capable of starting the rotation even in an aqueous solution. For coupling, a strong connection is recommended, such as a set screw or clamp, to ensure stability and prevent the cylinder from falling. Overall, the motor and coupling choice appear adequate for the project requirements.
dalou
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am new here as i want to ask something about an engineering project i am working on. I need a motor to rotate a 200 grams cylinder which will be hanging from the motor's shaft (vertically). I wanted less than 100 rpm so the motor I chose is a 2.1W 6V DC motor with a 50:1 reductor that leads to 60 rpm and 12.5Ncm. Will that be enough to keep that load rotating? I have no idea how much 12.5Ncm is and have nothing to compare it with. Moreover, what kind of coupling should I look for to fix the shaft of the cylinder to that of the motor? Will regular couplings be strong enough or will the cylinder fall down eventually? Thanks a lot for any responses, I really need your help here to make sure I won't buy anything wrong!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
nothing? please any comment would be helpful, i really need an opinion here..
 
dalou said:
Hi all,

I am new here as i want to ask something about an engineering project i am working on. I need a motor to rotate a 200 grams cylinder which will be hanging from the motor's shaft (vertically). I wanted less than 100 rpm so the motor I chose is a 2.1W 6V DC motor with a 50:1 reductor that leads to 60 rpm and 12.5Ncm. Will that be enough to keep that load rotating? I have no idea how much 12.5Ncm is and have nothing to compare it with. Moreover, what kind of coupling should I look for to fix the shaft of the cylinder to that of the motor? Will regular couplings be strong enough or will the cylinder fall down eventually? Thanks a lot for any responses, I really need your help here to make sure I won't buy anything wrong!

What's the torque of the gearmotor? The inertia of your cylinder? So the motor comes with a gear reducer or you're adding it yourself? Regardless, gearing it down will increase your torque; which you won't need much of once you get the cylinder actually moving.

Coupling depends on what it has to do. Regular coupling, what do you mean? Can you drill a holes into your cylinder and is it long relative to the drive shaft? If I could, I'd pin it right through the drive shaft (which will probably be pretty short), or use a set screw. If you can do a through-hole down the entire cylinder you can use a clamp at the base; whatever you want to do.
 
First of all thank you for your response..

The gearing comes integrated with the motor. From the motor's datasheet:
Supply Voltage: 6V
Power Rating: 2.1 W
Output Ratio: 50:1
Output Speed: 60rpm
Torque: 0.125Nm (This number includes the gearbox, i.e. it is already increased due to the use of gerbox)

The inertia of the cylinder is around 3.4 * 10^-5 Kg m^2. Moreover, the cylinder will be dipped and rotating in an aqueous solution. And I don't mind about acceleration rate, as long as it is able to get started rotating.

The drive shaft is around 1cm long. The cylinder is ~ 10cm long with a steel shaft put in its middle. How would you fix the one shaft (that of the cylinder) to the rotating one of the motor. I had in mind something like that:
http://uk.rs-online.com/web/search/searchBrowseAction.html?method=getProduct&R=3258189#header
would that work ok? Or would the weight of the cylinder be too much to be supported by this?

Thanks a lot,

dalou
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top