Decreasing Function: Understanding Why g is Decreasing at x=2 and x=-2

AI Thread Summary
The function g is decreasing between the points x = -2 and x = 2 because its derivative is negative in that interval. While the derivative at x = -2 and x = 2 is zero, indicating potential local extrema, the function's overall behavior is determined by the intervals where the derivative is negative. The first derivative test confirms that if the derivative is negative throughout an interval, the function decreases across that interval. The confusion arises from the distinction between open and closed intervals in calculus, where the endpoints may not be included in the decreasing behavior. Understanding these concepts clarifies why g is considered decreasing between -2 and 2, despite the derivative being zero at the endpoints.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
the question is http://home.earthlink.net/~urban-xrisis/clip_image002.jpg

The answer is A but I don't understand why the function g would be decreasing when x=2 and x=-2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer states between -2 and 2 not only when x=2 or x=-2. The function is decreasing because its derivative is negative. Where a derivative is negative the function is decreasing, where a derivative is positive the function is increasing. Think of your derivative as a slope, a negative slope means your function goes down from left to right(decreasing), and a positive slope means your function goes up from left to right(increasing).
 
no, it states between -2 and 2 AND when they are equal. why?
 
-2 \underline{<}x\underline{<}2
is different from:
-2 < x < 2

why would the slope be decreasing at x=-2 and x=2 when the derivative is zero?
 
I misunderstood your question sorry about that.The first derivative test(straight from a calc book) states:

"Suppose that f is continuous at each point of the closed interval [a,b] and differentiable at each point of its interior (a,b). if f'>0 at each point of *(a,b), then f increases throughout *[a,b].if f'<0 at each point of (a,b), then f decreases throughout [a,b]."

*notice that they are using () meaning not including endpoints, however, after they use[] which means that the whole interval is increasing including the end points, this is by definition. As to why I don't remember right now, the calc book isn't helping much either, but I'm pretty sure the definition is right.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top