Density of electrons in a metal (electricity)

AI Thread Summary
To find the density of free electrons in a metallic wire with a diameter of 4.12 mm and a current of 8.00 A, the relevant equation is I = nqv(drift)a. The user rearranged this equation to solve for n, which represents the number of charge carriers per unit volume, yielding a value of approximately 6.95 x 10^28 m^-3. The discussion emphasizes that this value of n is indeed the density of free electrons in the metal. Dimensional analysis confirms that n has the correct dimensions for density, validating the calculation. The final answer for the density of free electrons is thus 6.95 x 10^28 m^-3.
Talz1994
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A metallic wire has a diameter of 4.12mm. When the current in the wire is 8.00 A, the drift velocity is 5.40 10^-5 m/s

What is the density of free electrons in the metal?
Express your answer numerically in m^-3 to two significant figures.

Homework Equations


I=nqv(drift)a, where I is current, a is cross sectional area, v(drift) is the drift velocity, n is the number of charged particles per unit volume (i.e., the concentration of charged particles), and q is the magnitude of the charge on a charge carrier.

The Attempt at a Solution


This really confused me, but here's the equation that was given as a hint for the question when asked:
I=nqv(drift)a :where I is current, a is cross sectional area, v(drift) is the drift velocity, n is the number of charged particles per unit volume (i.e., the concentration of charged particles), and q is the magnitude of the charge on a charge carrier.

this is another hint given to question when asked:
Recall the definition of current as the net charge flowing through a given cross-sectional area per unit time. If you express the net charge flowing through the area in terms of the concentration of the charge carriers per unit volume, you will find that the current depends on the concentration and charge of the charged particles, as well as on the magnitude of their drift velocity. Recall that in metals the charge carriers are free electrons.

I really don't understand this question, can somebody please walk me through it? step by step,

i rearranged the equation
I/Avq=n
n=6.945314735*10^28

what do i do next, how am i supposed to find density from number of electrons :@
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You already found the number of free electrons pr unit volume, which i think is the density.
 
seriously i have? how?
 
What is the dimensions of 'n' in the formula you used. Can you evalute its dimensions using dimensional analysis?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top