Density of states of graphene per unit area

Physicslad78
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

My aim is to get the density of states (DOS) per unit area for monolayer (bilayer) graphene. I have done this using mathematica. I have set a sampling k grid with 22500 points and computed the expression:

DOS=(1/Nk)*Ʃ δ(E-Ek) where the sum is over the k points in the reciprocal space and Nk is the total number of k vectors covering the First Brillouin zone. Then I substituted the δ-function with a gaussian function so that the above DOS is obtained per energy. My question is how to obtain the DOS per area from this expression. Do we have to divide by the area of the Brillouin zone (is it the area of the Unit cells described by lattice vectors?). If yes, is it in the real space of reciprocal space? Thanks a lot...waiting for your reply..




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you have to divide by the area of the Brillouin zone. The area is in the reciprocal space as it is related to the reciprocal lattice vectors. The area of the Brillouin zone is given by A = (2π)^2/|det(G)|, where G is the matrix containing the reciprocal lattice vectors. Therefore, the DOS per unit area is given by DOS/(2π)^2/|det(G)|.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top