Derivation of Simple Harmonic Motion for a Spherical Bowl

  • Thread starter merryjman
  • Start date
  • #1
183
0
Problem: Prove that it is valid to model a particle in a smooth hemispherical bowl as a simple pendulum, provided its maximum displacement is small.

Answer: Usually, a FBD is used along with Newton's 2nd, and then the small angle approximation is used twice (once for siintheta in the weight component and once for tantheta to convert linear to rotational). Eventually you get the usual second-order Diffyq for angular displacement.

Question: Some of my students instead used the centripetal force requirement, setting the normal force (which is equal to the perp. component of the particle's weight) equal to the usual centripetal force equation. Using small angles, the costheta term in the normal force becomes 1, and the problem reduces to the familiar form.

Do you all feel that this is also a valid way to solve the problem? It seems OK to me; it involves Newton's 2nd, as well as the small angle approx., and I can't find anything wrong with it. But I thought I'd see what you all thought.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mezarashi
Homework Helper
650
0
I think that this question is nearly the same as: Derive the "simple pendulum equation" from Newton's 2nd law. The only difference between the bowl and pendulum is the centripetal force is the normal force instead of the tension.

So to me, if the unusual approach you mention is acceptable for the question I state above, I would consider it acceptable for your question as well =)
 
  • #3
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,979
2,322

Related Threads on Derivation of Simple Harmonic Motion for a Spherical Bowl

Replies
1
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
674
Top