Derive Equation of motion using Lagrangian density?

safekhan
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement [/b]

q1.png

The attempt at a solution[/b]
ans.jpg


I have done the first bit but don't know how to show that phi(r,t) is a solution to the equation of motion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Substitute the given ##\phi## into the left side of your equation; substitute the given ##\phi## into the right side of your equation. After doing this, show that left = right.

Equivalently, but perhaps a little cleaner: take all your terms to the left side; show that substituting ##\phi## into the left side gives zero.
 
thanks, but how should I treat p.r term in the solution while differentiating with respect to (t,x,y,z)
 
safekhan said:
thanks, but how should I treat p.r term in the solution while differentiating with respect to (t,x,y,z)

What does

$$\mathbf{p} \cdot \mathbf{r}=?$$
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top