Derive the optical path length of the incident light

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Taylor expansion for two concentric spherical surfaces of a Mangin Mirror, which involves surfaces with radii r1 and r2. Participants clarify that the task requires expressing the surfaces in terms of the x and y-axis positions. The optical path length of incident light reflecting back to the lens surface with radius r1 is also a key point of inquiry. The reference to a specific diagram (C-4) helps visualize the problem. Overall, the conversation seeks guidance on starting these calculations and understanding their applications in optics.
kpl
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have been asked to write down the taylor expansion for two concentric spherical surfaces with radii r1 and r2 of a lens and mirror combination which I think is called a Mangin Mirror.

It is supposed to be related to the x and y-axis positions.

Also, I have been asked to derive the optical path length of the incident light being reflected back to the surface of the lens with radius r1.

I don't know were to start for either question.

Any ideas would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the application? Is this homework?
 
kpl said:
I have been asked to write down the taylor expansion

Of what?

for two concentric spherical surfaces with radii r1 and r2 of a lens and mirror combination which I think is called a Mangin Mirror.

Is this like figure C-4 on the following page?

http://www.jmloptical.com/level2/ProductInfo/m_spherical_info.aspx

(found via a Google search for "Mangin mirror")

It is supposed to be related to the x and y-axis positions.

Again, of what?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Optics reply

Exactly like the C-4 diagram.
Let z1(y) and z2(y) be the expressions for the two surfaces of the lens in Figure 1 (see attachment) respectively. Write down the Taylor expansions of z1 and z2 to the fourth power of y.
 

Attachments

Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top