Derive the relation between the P & R branches

Bananen
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Moved from a technical forum, so homework template missing
Hi,

I have an assignment to derive the two following expressions:

R(J)-P(J)=2B'(2J+1)
R(J-1)-P(J+1)=2B''(2J+1)
where Bis the rotational constant and prime ' stands for upper level and bis '' for lower level.
Bv=Be-α(v+1/2)

using the selection rules (I guess in this case ΔJ=±1) and ΔT=G(v')-G(v'')+F(J')-F(J'') where ΔT is the transition/energy difference
between two energy levels expressed in wavenumbers and F(J)=BJ(J+1)
G(v)=ωe(v+1/2)-ωexe(v+1/2)2.

I don't understand how I'm going to put all of this together and I don't understand what they mean with R(J) and P(J) etc.
Thankful for any help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll have to give more background. Can you provide with the exact problem statement?
 
It's difficult to determine if there is a precise question in OP's post.

R(J) refers to the energy of an R-branch transition originating from the J'th rotational state. Ditto for P(J) (for a P-branch transition). You might spend some time poring over this diagram:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotat...scopy#/media/File:Vibrationrotationenergy.svg

Also, presumably this is comparing P and R branches of the same vibrational transition, so you don't have to worry about most of the expressions you've listed involving vibrational quantum numbers. Maybe, as @DrClaude suggested, you could give us a more focused question?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top