Deriving absolute error equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving an error equation from the formula e/m = 2V/(B²R²). The user is struggling with how to handle constants in the derivation, particularly the "2V" term, and is unsure about treating e/m as a single variable. Another participant clarifies that when multiplying by a constant, one should add its relative error, noting that the relative or absolute error for constants is typically zero. This realization helps the original poster feel less confused about the derivation process. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding error propagation in mathematical equations.
AcecA
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to derive an error equation from the following equation...
\frac{e}{m} = \frac{2V}{B^{2}R^{2}}

Homework Equations


Just... basic... derivation rules...

The Attempt at a Solution


I did try, just don't know how to put the stupid attempt in LaTeX...

I'm stuck at the "2V" part because, in our package, there is no description on how to deal with constants. And I was told to treat \frac{e}{m} as a single variable. Thanks, guys :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
AcecA said:

Homework Statement


I need to derive an error equation from the following equation...
\frac{e}{m} = \frac{2V}{B^{2}R^{2}}


Homework Equations


Just... basic... derivation rules...


The Attempt at a Solution


I did try, just don't know how to put the stupid attempt in LaTeX...

I'm stuck at the "2V" part because, in our package, there is no description on how to deal with constants. And I was told to treat \frac{e}{m} as a single variable. Thanks, guys :)

If you are dealing with error propagation then where you are multiplying by a constant you add its relative error like anything else ... but of course it's relative error or absolute error for that matter is necessarily 0.
 
Okie. Now I feel stupid at not realizing something so simple. Thanks :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top