Deriving the Energy-Momentum Formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the energy-momentum relationship, E^2 = p^2 * c^2 + (m*c^2)^2, using the equations E = (gamma)*m*c and p = (gamma)*m*u. The user initially squared the momentum equation and attempted to express mass in terms of momentum, but struggled with the presence of the Lorentz factor, gamma. After some algebraic manipulation, they found a solution to eliminate gamma and arrive at the desired formula. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between energy, momentum, and mass in the context of relativistic physics. Ultimately, the user successfully derived the energy-momentum formula.
Rulesby
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the energy-momentum relationship, E^2 = p^2 * c^2 + (m*c^2)^2, follows from the expressions E = (gamma)*m*c and p = (gamma)*m*u

where

(gamma) = 1 / sqrt(1 - (u^2)/(c^2)) the lorentz transformation factor.
m is the rest mass.
c is the speed of light
u is the velocity of the particle
E is the total energy
p is the momentum

The book does not teach about relativistic mass, so I think I supposed to derive this without making a distinction between m and m0.

Homework Equations


(1): E^2 = p^2 * c^2 + (m*c^2)^2
(2): E = (gamma)*m*c
(3): p = (gamma)*m*u

The Attempt at a Solution


When the chapter introduces the formula E^2 = p^2 * c^2 + (m*c)^2, it does not show how it derived this equation. Instead it says that it just says "By squaring [equations (2) and (3)] and subtracting, we can eliminate u. The result after some algebra is [equation (1)]."

My first attempt was to start by squaring both sides of equation (3).

p^2 = (gamma)^2*m^2*u^2

Then get it in terms of m^2.

m^2 = (p^2)/(u^2) - (p^2)/(c^2)

In equation (2), square both sides, then substitute m^2 to get:

E^2 = (gamma)^2 * [(p^2)/(u^2) - (p^2)/(c^2)] * c^2

After some algebra I got:

E^2 = [(gamma)^4 * m^2 * c^4] - [(gamma)^2 * p^2 * c^2]

This is nearly what I'm trying to derive, however, the (gamma) terms are still there and I don't know how to get rid of them.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top