Deriving the Energy-Momentum Formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the energy-momentum relationship, E^2 = p^2 * c^2 + (m*c^2)^2, using the equations E = (gamma)*m*c and p = (gamma)*m*u. The user initially squared the momentum equation and attempted to express mass in terms of momentum, but struggled with the presence of the Lorentz factor, gamma. After some algebraic manipulation, they found a solution to eliminate gamma and arrive at the desired formula. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between energy, momentum, and mass in the context of relativistic physics. Ultimately, the user successfully derived the energy-momentum formula.
Rulesby
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the energy-momentum relationship, E^2 = p^2 * c^2 + (m*c^2)^2, follows from the expressions E = (gamma)*m*c and p = (gamma)*m*u

where

(gamma) = 1 / sqrt(1 - (u^2)/(c^2)) the lorentz transformation factor.
m is the rest mass.
c is the speed of light
u is the velocity of the particle
E is the total energy
p is the momentum

The book does not teach about relativistic mass, so I think I supposed to derive this without making a distinction between m and m0.

Homework Equations


(1): E^2 = p^2 * c^2 + (m*c^2)^2
(2): E = (gamma)*m*c
(3): p = (gamma)*m*u

The Attempt at a Solution


When the chapter introduces the formula E^2 = p^2 * c^2 + (m*c)^2, it does not show how it derived this equation. Instead it says that it just says "By squaring [equations (2) and (3)] and subtracting, we can eliminate u. The result after some algebra is [equation (1)]."

My first attempt was to start by squaring both sides of equation (3).

p^2 = (gamma)^2*m^2*u^2

Then get it in terms of m^2.

m^2 = (p^2)/(u^2) - (p^2)/(c^2)

In equation (2), square both sides, then substitute m^2 to get:

E^2 = (gamma)^2 * [(p^2)/(u^2) - (p^2)/(c^2)] * c^2

After some algebra I got:

E^2 = [(gamma)^4 * m^2 * c^4] - [(gamma)^2 * p^2 * c^2]

This is nearly what I'm trying to derive, however, the (gamma) terms are still there and I don't know how to get rid of them.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top