Design an O-Ring Groove w/ AS568A Series/Chart

  • Thread starter Thread starter vishugupta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design
AI Thread Summary
To design an O-ring groove, knowing the O-ring cross-section diameter and inner diameter allows for the use of the AS568A series/chart to find necessary dimensions. Parker's O-ring Handbook is a key resource for standard gland dimensions and material compatibility. While standard sizes are generally sufficient, there are instances, especially in high-pressure applications, where custom dimensions may be necessary. For static seals with limited movement, O-rings are effective, but dynamic applications may require alternative sealing solutions. The discussion also raises concerns about gland fill calculations, noting that ideal fill should be 75-80%, yet AS568A dimensions sometimes suggest over 100% fill, indicating a potential misunderstanding in the application of the standards.
vishugupta
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi Everybody,
I want to design an o-ring groove. I presume if you know the o-ring cross-section dia and inner dia of o-ring you can use the AS568A series/chart and find the required dimensions? Am i right? please guide?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi vishugupta,
The bible for the industry is Parker's O-ring Handbook. They provide standard gland dimensions for all types of applications and a section on material compatibility. The book can be downloaded here:
http://www.parker.com/literature/ORD 5700 Parker_O-Ring_Handbook.pdf

As you've noted, the standard sizes are listed per AS568. Generally, there's no need to go outside of these dimensions, though I've often done so, even for pressure as high as 15,000 psi. The standard gland dimensions need not always be applied and sometimes there are reasons to go outside the box, especially for high pressure applications.

There are also non-standard O-rings designed to fit the same dimensions as these standards, but the O-rings aren't round. Quad-seals for example, are X shaped and work great for dynamic applications.

If your seal is a static one or has very limited movement, preferably with a lubricant, and as long as temperature and pressure are within limits, then an O-ring is a great way to go. If however, your application is a dynamic one that has to last a long time such as piston rings, or is outside the pressure and temperature limits, then there are other solutions to sealing that will be better than using elastomeric O-rings.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hi

what is the formula for calculating gland fill. I read value of gland fill should be ideally 75-80% to accommodate various expansions(thermal,etc) but in AS568A standards for a particular o-ring cross-section dia , the gland height and width is always lesser. This leads to gland fill being more than 100%
What mistake am i making. Please guide
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top