Determine charge at origin, based on charge density function

xSilja
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2015-9-23_18-30-1.png


a) and b) are no problem.

I need help to solve c) and d)

Homework Equations


c) Delta dirac function
Gauss' law

d) Gauss' law
## \int_V {\rho \, d\tau} = Q_{enclosed} ##

The Attempt at a Solution


By taking laplace on the potential I get:

## \rho(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{q_0}{4 \, \pi \, r} \, e^{-r/\lambda} \, \left( \frac{cos^2(\theta)}{\lambda^2} + \frac{2}{r^2} (1-3 \, cos^2(\theta)) \right)##

c) I got a hint that it was a good idea to use the dirac delta function along with the charge distribution.

But I'm not exactly sure why. As I understand it the dirac delta function "picks out" the value of a function at zero. So I'd get:

## \int {\rho(\mathbf{r}) \, \delta(r) \, dr} = \rho(0) ##

I realize that there must be a dimensional problem here, but I'm not sure how to use a delta function in 3D and spherical coordinates.
Also how will it help me to find the density at the origin? Can I apply Gauss' law here and let the radius go towards zero to get the charge in the origin?

d) I want to solve the integral

## Q = \int_0^\pi \int_0^{2 \, \pi} \int_a^{\infty} \, \rho(\mathbf{r}) \, r^2 \, \sin(\theta) \, dr \, d\theta \, d\phi ##

I tried evaluating this with Maple.
By assuming a>0 I get a complex function multiplied by infinity, which is not of much use.
If I also assume lambda>0 (as it says in the problem) I get rid of the infinity, but get exponential integrals instead.
I'm not sure how to move on from here. I suspect I need to modify my function for charge distribution by assumptions, to make it simpler.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xSilja said:
c) I got a hint that it was a good idea to use the dirac delta function along with the charge distribution.
This assumes your charge density formula doesn't have problems with r=0. That might be, but I wouldn't rely on it.

Using the electric field, you can determine the total charge up to a radius a and then let a go to zero.
The opposite limit also works for (d) and does not need evaluating any actual integrals.
 
By best idea was also to use Gauss' law. ## \int_V \mathbf{\nabla} \cdot \mathbf{E} \, d\tau = \frac{1}{\epsilon_0} \, Q_{enclosed} ##
How can I avoid evaluating any actual integrals?
The charge density/ elctric field depends on both r and theta.
 
xSilja said:
How can I avoid evaluating any actual integrals?
Set them up, then find useful bounds on them.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top