Determine the magnitude of the torque

  • Thread starter Thread starter deltas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnitude Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the torque produced by a 25.0 N weight held in an outstretched hand, with specific measurements for the shoulder-to-elbow and elbow-to-wrist lengths. The participant attempts to use the torque formula t = lF but encounters confusion regarding the units, mistakenly using meters instead of centimeters. After recalculating, they realize the need to convert the lever arm distances to the correct units for accurate torque measurement. The correct torque values are determined to be 752.5 N·cm about the elbow and 1403 N·cm about the shoulder. The conversation emphasizes the importance of unit consistency in physics calculations.
deltas
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 25.0 N weight is held in the outstretched hand of a person with a shoulder-to-elbow length of 26.0 cm and an elbow-to-wrist length of 22.5 cm. The center of the weight is 7.5 cm from the person's wrist. A) Determine the magnitude of the torque about the elbow produced by the weight and B) Determine the magnitude of the torque about the shoulder produced by the weight.

http://educog.com/res/fsu/capalibrary/24equilibrium/Graphics/prob22a.gif​
[/URL]

Homework Equations


Well, I can think of a few ways to solve for torque:

t = lF
tnet = I\alpha
tnet = I\alpha
(I = mr2)
(F = ma)

The Attempt at a Solution


Alright, well, for the first equation I knew that t = lF, where l is the lever arm distance and F is the force in Newtons.
l = 30.1 (a), 56.1(b)
F = ma
F = 2.55 x 9.81 = 25 (given)
t = 25 x 30.1 [56.1]
t = 752.5 NM [1403 NM]
Something is clearly not right here, help! I can tell I'm missing something basic, but I don't know what.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Check your units.
 


Centimeters? Was it centimeters the whole time?
 


It wasn't because you used Nm for the torque when it should be N*cm.
 


No, that's what I meant. I hadn't noticed that it was cm instead of m! Thank you!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top