Determining Final Velocity of an Electron Absorbing an X-ray?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gbaby370
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compton effect
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the final velocity of an electron after absorbing an X-ray with a wavelength of 2.5 x 10^-8 m. The initial attempt used a formula for conservation of momentum, but there were errors in the mass of the electron and the assumption of an elastic collision. It was clarified that a solitary electron cannot absorb a photon in the way described, and if it were to interact, it would involve the Compton effect, where the photon scatters rather than being absorbed. The correct approach requires addressing the inelastic nature of the interaction and ensuring accurate values for constants. The conversation highlights the need for precise understanding of particle interactions in physics problems.
gbaby370
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hey, I was just wondering if someone could give me feedback on a problem. For some reason the answer is not in the back of the text.

Homework Statement



An x-ray with a wavelength of 2.5 x 10-8 m is absorbed by a stationary electron. Determine the final velocity of the electron.
Vxray=3.0x10^8 m/s
Velectron=0
melectron= 1.602x10^-19kg
mxray=(h/λc)
Velectron(after)=
h=6.626x10^-34Js
λ=2.5x10^-8

Homework Equations


Velectron(after)= Vxray((2(h/cλ))/(melectron+(h/cλ)))

The Attempt at a Solution



V(electronafter)= (3.0x10^8)((2((6.626x10^-34)/(3.0x10^8)(2.5x10^-8))/(1.602x10^-19)((6.626x10^-34)/(3.0x10^8)(2.5x10^-8)))

v(electronafter)= 3.31x10^-7m/s

Sorry if the formula is hard to understand, I used the formula for conservation of momentum in an elastic collision where one object is stationary before the collision.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem statement doesn't mention a proton. How does it come into the problem?
 
Sorry anywhere it says proton it should say electron.
 
A solitary electron cannot absorb a photon. (Also if it did, it would be an inelastic collision, not an elastic collision.) If this problem is about the Compton effect, the photon scatters off the stationary electron.

Your value for the mass of the electron isn't correct.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top