Determining Maximum bending moment via shear force diagram

AI Thread Summary
To determine the maximum bending moment using a shear force diagram, it's essential to first calculate the external reactions. The participant initially divided the beam into sections to derive equations for shear force (V) and bending moment (M). They expressed confusion regarding the effect of an external moment on the last section of the beam, questioning if V could equal 10. The discussion emphasizes that the shear diagram remains unaffected by externally applied moments, which is crucial for accurate plotting. The final shear force plot should reflect these calculations without incorporating the external moment directly into the last section's shear force.
Tom McCurdy
Messages
1,017
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://imagebin.ca/img/uzuDsi.jpg

and by maximum it means in magnitude

Homework Equations



I figured the best (easiest/quickest) method would be to draw the shear force diagram.

When I originally did this problem I came up with equations for M and V by dividing the bar into sections from the right until the last section in which I took the section from the right to include the external moment for the M equation. I am not sure how to figure out V for the last section though.


V=
0<x<2 V=40-10x V facing down and M going counterclockwise
2<x<5 V= -5 V facing down and M going counterclockwise
5<x<7 V= -15 V facing down and M going counterclockwise
7<x<10 V=-10 facing up and M going counterclockwise
The part I am not sure about is how the external moment of 35 comes into play in the last section.

I feel like it would be incorrect to say V = 10 for the last section?


What would the final shear force plot look like?
How do I finish this problem?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your picture is not showing up. Be sure to determine external reactions first. When you plot a shear diagram, the diagram is unaffected by externally applied moments.
 
PhanthomJay said:
Your picture is not showing up.

I found it … http://imagebin.ca/img/uzuDsi.jpg"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top