MHB Determining Terms in $\sum_{n=-N}^{N}|e^{J\frac{\pi}{4}n}|^2$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drain Brain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms
AI Thread Summary
The summation $\sum_{n=-N}^{N}|e^{J\frac{\pi}{4}n}|^2$ contains a total of 2N + 1 terms. This is determined by counting the range of n from -N to N, which includes N negative values, zero, and N positive values. The magnitude of the complex exponential function squared equals one, confirming that each term contributes equally. The confusion arose from considering alternative ranges, but the correct count is based on the specified limits. Thus, the total number of terms in the summation is indeed 2N + 1.
Drain Brain
Messages
143
Reaction score
0


I just want to know how do I determine the number of terms will be in this summation. The answer to this 2N+1 terms. I can only arrive at preliminary steps of solving this. can you tell why 2N+1 is the number of terms? I know that the magnitude of complex exponential function squared would result to one.

$\sum_{n=-N}^{N}|e^{J\frac{\pi}{4}n}|^2$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Drain Brain said:
I just want to know how do I determine the number of terms will be in this summation. The answer to this 2N+1 terms. I can only arrive at preliminary steps of solving this. can you tell why 2N+1 is the number of terms? I know that the magnitude of complex exponential function squared would result to one.

$\sum_{n=-N}^{N}|e^{J\frac{\pi}{4}n}|^2$

as n is from -N to N the total number of terms is N ( -N to -1) + 1 ( zero) + N ( 1 to N) = 2N + 1

Within parenthesis I have mentioned the range
 
kaliprasad said:
as n is from -N to N the total number of terms is N ( -N to -1) + 1 ( zero) + N ( 1 to N) = 2N + 1

Within parenthesis I have mentioned the range

Hi kaliprasad! How did you choose the range?
 
Drain Brain said:
Hi kaliprasad! How did you choose the range?

In the sum that is (sigma) n is from -N to N and hence the range
 
kaliprasad said:
In the sum that is (sigma) n is from -N to N and hence the range

why it is only -N to -1, 0, and 1 to N? I'm thinking of other ranges like -N to -2 etc.. I'm confused. Please help.
 
Drain Brain said:
why it is only -N to -1, 0, and 1 to N? I'm thinking of other ranges like -N to -2 etc.. I'm confused. Please help.

Sorry for the confusion. I counted the number of -ve values, positive values and zero separately. from -N to +N it is 2N+1 values
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top