Determining the magnitude of unknown charges

  • Thread starter Thread starter crazuiee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Magnitude
AI Thread Summary
To determine the ratio of the magnitudes of two charges, a positive charge +q1 and a negative charge -q2, the net electric field is zero 1.00m to the right of -q2, leading to the equation kq1/r1^2 = kq2/r2^2. The distances are confirmed as r1 = 4.00m and r2 = 1.00m, but the ratio of the charges is not simply the ratio of the distances; it must be squared, resulting in q1/q2 = 16. Additionally, the potential can be zero at two locations: between the charges and outside near the smaller charge, requiring the equation kq1/(d-x) - kq2/x = 0 to find the exact positions. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
crazuiee
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A positive charge +q1 is 3.00m to the left of a negative charge -q2. The net electric field is zero 1.00m to the right of the negative charge. Determine the relative magnitude of the charges in a ratio q1/q2

Homework Equations


E=kQ/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I set it so that kQ1/r1^2=kQ2/r2^2 but I'm not sure how to solve for the ratio? would the k's cancel out and it'd just be a ratio of the distances? Are the distances r1=4.00m and r2=1.00m?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your distances are correct.
Find Q1/Q2.
 
would the ratio just work out to be the ratio of the distances? so 4/1?
 
No. It should be square of the distances.
 
So q1= +16 and q2= -1 ? Also there's a part of the question that asks to locate two spots where the potential is zero, in relation to the negative charge, any ideas how to find it?
 
In between the charges you can get zero potential. Similarly out side the charges near the smaller charge you can get another spot where then potential is zero.
If x is the distance where the potential is zero, then
kq1/(d-x) - kq2/x = 0
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top