Diameter diff between flow pipe and component connector

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the issue of mismatched pipe sizes between flow pipes and component inlets, such as fancoils, where a 1.5" pipe may connect to a 1" inlet. It emphasizes that sizing pipes solely based on component inlet sizes is inadequate and can lead to inefficiencies. Pressure drop considerations are mentioned as a potential reason for these discrepancies, but the importance of ensuring proper flow conditions is stressed. The conversation argues that each installation is unique and should be evaluated on its own merits rather than defaulting to component specifications. Ultimately, proper pipe sizing should prioritize system requirements over manufacturer assumptions.
TSN79
Messages
422
Reaction score
0
So many places I've seen components (fancoils and such) with inlets that are let's say 1", but where the pipe leading up it is maybe 1 1/2". Does that make any sense at all? Can pressure drop have something to do with it?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I know this was probably just an example, but please, don't fall into the trap that MANY people do which is to base your piping size on the inlet size of a component like a pump. There is indeed a lot of examples out there where people were over generous in their sizing "just to make sure" there won't be a problem.

That being said, every installation is different and may have its reasons for doing so. It may very well be pressure drop. If cost per foot of pipe is not of real concern, then increasing the pipe size to the component is the easiest thing to do.
 
Thx for the quick response :)
With pumps I believe it's a bit different, since they actually increase the flow. But with components where the water just flows through isn't the most logical thing just to just to base the pipe size on the inlet? The only reason I can see not to is if the manufacturer of the component based its pipe size on a much higher pressure drop than what the pipe leading up to it will have.
 
"But with components where the water just flows through isn't the most logical thing just to just to base the pipe size on the inlet?"

No, sizing your pipe to match the component inlet is a lazy, ignorant thing to do, and doing so defies logic. The "most logical thing" is to get the fluid to the inlet at the proper conditions. The component vendor has no idea whatsoever what your system looks like, or what you have to do to meet his assumed inlet conditions.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top