Did I make a mistake in my balance force equations for homework?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating base reaction forces at points A and B using given parameters, including distances and an applied load. The user initially expresses concern about obtaining unrealistic answers from their balance equations. After reviewing their calculations, they realize they made a mistake and confirm that their revised approach is now correct. The thread concludes with a suggestion to mark the discussion as solved, indicating resolution of the issue. Overall, the user successfully navigates through their confusion to arrive at the correct solution.
rihitz
Messages
16
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


IMG_20160929_152147.jpg

Given:
a=10m
l=18m
P=18kN
angle alpha = 35 deg

The task is to calculate the base reaction forces on A and on B

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


IMG_20160929_152431.jpg

This is my attempt on creating the balance equation system.[/B]
When replacing the variables with numbers, and trying to solve the equations, I get , in my opinion , unrealistic answers.

Is there any mistake this far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rihitz said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 106648
Given:
a=10m
l=18m
P=18kN
angle alpha = 35 deg

The task is to calculate the base reaction forces on A and on B

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


View attachment 106649
This is my attempt on creating the balance equation system.[/B]
When replacing the variables with numbers, and trying to solve the equations, I get , in my opinion , unrealistic answers.

Is there any mistake this far?
No.
 
Chestermiller said:
No.
IMG_20160929_154916.jpg
So this is correct as well?

I guess I found my mistake.
 
rihitz said:
View attachment 106651 So this is correct as well?

I guess I found my mistake.
Maybe you want to mark the thread Solved.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Force balance equations with moving base
Replies
1
Views
1K
Force equations: Force on ground by angled supports
Replies
21
Views
2K
Calculating Forces in a Leg: Gait Analysis and Joint Reaction Force
Replies
7
Views
1K
What mistake did I make in finding the reaction at hinge A?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Balancing Forces on a Scale: Man with Pulleys and Tensions
Replies
7
Views
2K
Why is the thrust equation same under gravitational force?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Balancing magnetic forces on rods
Replies
4
Views
1K
Friction - problem with one of the equilibrium equations
Replies
13
Views
1K
Terminal velocity of a skier using a Momentum Balance
Replies
1
Views
2K
What mistake did I make in finding the net force on a rotating disc?
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top