Difference between beta and electron particle

AI Thread Summary
Electrons and beta particles both have a charge of -1e, but they are not the same entity. Beta-minus rays, which are emitted during radioactive decay, consist of high-speed electrons, while beta-plus rays are positrons. The distinction lies in their origin; beta particles are specifically associated with nuclear reactions, whereas electrons are fundamental components of atoms. Historically, beta rays were identified as electrons during the study of radioactivity. Understanding this differentiation clarifies the nature of particles emitted during nuclear processes.
electron
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
hi..

we all know a electron and a beta patricle have charge -1e ..
now my question is.. when radioactivity takes place ..the nucleus emits beta particles sometimes...

now can we say that the electron is being emitted from the nucleus..since both beta and electron have the same charge..

i know tis is wrong...but don't know why...

does anyone have any clue ..??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Beta-(minus) rays are nothing but electrons. Beta+ rays, emitted in inverse beta decay, are positrons.
 
but in real how do we physically differentiate them..
 
We don't differentiate between beta-minus rays and electrons, if that's what you are asking. Electrons as a component of atom was discovered in 1897. Also, around 1896, the three kind of "rays" coming from radioactive decay was called alpha, beta and gamma rays. Afterwards, it was found that the beta rays were made up of high speed electrons.
 
ahh.. i get it hopefully...

tankx

chears !
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

How to calculate gamma ray energies following beta decay?
Replies
12
Views
1K
Can Geiger Counter Ticks be converted into particle/wave counts?
Replies
12
Views
2K
Why does an alpha particle curve less in a magnetic field than a beta?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Isotope decay via alpha and beta particle emissions
Replies
1
Views
1K
Finding a Parametric Solution for Particle Trajectory in Magnetic Field
Replies
3
Views
2K
Is the Photoelectric Effect Proof That Light Is a Particle?
Replies
35
Views
3K
Beta particle interaction with matter
Replies
3
Views
2K
The Relationship Between Masses and Angles in a Pulley System
Replies
29
Views
3K
Beta Spectroscopy: Decay Path of Na 22 and Sr 90 | Experimental Setup & Results
Replies
1
Views
2K
Electrons and their little role in nuclear physics
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top