Difference between internal E and enthelpy

AI Thread Summary
Internal energy is distinct from kinetic and potential energy, as it encompasses the total kinetic energy of molecules in ideal gases, while real gases also include potential energy due to intermolecular forces. In ideal gases, potential energy is negligible, focusing solely on kinetic energy, which is temperature-dependent. The relationship between internal energy and enthalpy is defined by the equation ΔH = ΔU + PΔV, indicating that enthalpy accounts for changes in both internal energy and pressure-volume work. For ideal gases, changes in internal energy and enthalpy can be equivalent, but for real gases, they differ significantly due to the presence of intermolecular forces. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for analyzing energy changes in thermodynamic processes.
chiddler
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to understand two things:

1. How internal energy is distinct from kinetic and potential energy

2. The difference between internal energy and enthalpy.

Homework Equations


enthalpy ΔH = ΔU + PΔV
internal energy ΔU = Q + W = Q - PΔV

The Attempt at a Solution


I have searched old posts. I found this. And this.

My book asked a question: if an exothermic reaction occurs in a closed system, does internal energy change? The answer is no. So it seems that internal energy includes potential energy. Both pages that I linked say that E = KE + PE + U. This suggests that internal energy and potential energy are completely distinct, yet the book question suggests that they are the same! Also, how is internal energy different from enthalpy?

thank you very much!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
chiddler said:
1. How internal energy is distinct from kinetic and potential energy
For ideal gases, internal energy is the total kinetic energy of the molecules. For a real gas, it includes potential and kinetic energies.

In an ideal gas, potential energy (which is energy due to the separation of molecules relative to others) does not exist. So it is only kinetic energy that you have to take into account. Translational kinetic energy is a function of temperature. But diatomic and polyatomic molecules can have kinetic energy other than translational kinetic energy (vibrational, rotational). These other kinetic energies are a function of temperature as well.

For real gases, molecules exert forces on each other. This forces can be relatively strong (eg. water vapour) or weak (vanderwaals forces). It takes energy to overcome those forces to increase the separation of the molecules - ie. potential energy. So when energy is added and volume increases, some of the energy added goes into increasing potential energy, which means it does not go into increasing the kinetic energy of the molecules.
My book asked a question: if an exothermic reaction occurs in a closed system, does internal energy change? The answer is no. So it seems that internal energy includes potential energy. Both pages that I linked say that E = KE + PE + U. This suggests that internal energy and potential energy are completely distinct, yet the book question suggests that they are the same! Also, how is internal energy different from enthalpy?
In any process the change in internal energy is equal to the energy transfer that occurs. This energy transfer can result from Work (W) being done on or by the system or heat flow (Q) into or out of the system.

Since H = U + PV,

dH = dU + PdV + VdP

For an ideal gas PdV = - VdP so dH = dU. But for real gases, PdV ≠ VdP so enthalpy becomes useful.

AM
 
thanks very much for the excellent response.
 
chiddler said:
thanks very much for the excellent response.
The only problem is that the explanation for dH is not quite right!
Andrew Mason said:
For an ideal gas PdV = - VdP so dH = dU. But for real gases, PdV ≠ VdP so enthalpy becomes useful.
This is only true if T is constant, in which case dH = dU = 0.

I'll have a look at this again later.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
The only problem is that the explanation for dH is not quite right!
This is only true if T is constant, in which case dH = dU = 0.

I'll have a look at this again later.

AM

appreciate it. I'm not very comfortable in a calculus based approach as my physics was only algebra based. So could you please accommodate me in your response? (ie, more conceptual, please)

I didn't ask immediately because I didn't think this question gathered enough interest for follow up questions!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top