Difference between kinetic energy and momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the differences between kinetic energy (KE) and momentum, particularly in the context of collisions. The original poster explores how energy can transform into heat while questioning the conservation of momentum in similar scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of kinetic energy as a scalar quantity versus momentum as a vector quantity. The original poster attempts to reconcile the conservation of momentum with the transformation of kinetic energy into heat during collisions. Others raise points about the implications of Newton's third law and the directional nature of momentum.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with some participants providing insights into the conceptual differences between KE and momentum. There is an acknowledgment of the complexities involved in visualizing these concepts, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates that this inquiry is not strictly a homework question, suggesting a more exploratory discussion rather than a problem-solving scenario. There is also a mention of potential confusion regarding the relationship between energy transformation and momentum conservation.

Jeff5738
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Not exactly a homework question, so sorry if I'm in the wrong forum

Homework Statement



I'm trying to understand the difference between KE and momentum.

Homework Equations



It seems to me that:
In a collision, KE can be converted into heat, which is a kind of KE/potential energy because it is the vibration of atoms: ie, energy is conserved, but it can change into a different kind of energy.

But what about momentum? As far as I understand, momentum is always conserved, even in inelastic collisions. But if some of the KE has become heat after a collision, why can't some of the momentum become heat, too. Or don't vibrating atoms have momentum?

The Attempt at a Solution



OK. Maybe I'm seeing a possible answer here: because those atoms are vibrating randomly in different directions, the aggregate momentum of the body warmed after the collision does not change due to the warming. Momentum can't be changed into heat and the body has to change its overall motion instead.

Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's quite hard to conceptualise but the difference can be shown by remembering that energy is a scalar quantity and momentum is a vector quantity. In a collision, due to Newton's third law of motion -- every action has an equal and opposite reaction -- the total momentum of a system is conserved. I can't really think of a way of describing this properly in terms of the question you asked, so I'll leave that to someone else.
 
You're basically correct. You need to think of momentum as a vector quantity. Immagine two trains with the same mass and magnitude of velocity collide head-on. The initial Kenitic energy was huge, but actually, momentum was zero!

p = p1 + p2 = mv -mv = 0

This is why it's important to remember that momentum is a vector quantity. The sign for momentum is going to depend on how you choose your corrdinate system. For my example above, train number 2 was traveling in the negative direction.
 
Thanks. All sorted out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
6K