Difference between kinetic energy and momentum

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy (KE) can be transformed into other forms, such as heat, during collisions, while momentum remains conserved regardless of the type of collision. Inelastic collisions can result in a loss of KE as it converts to heat, but momentum, being a vector quantity, is always conserved. The aggregate momentum of a system does not change even if some energy is converted to heat because the random vibrations of atoms do not contribute to a net change in momentum. Understanding that momentum is a vector and energy is a scalar helps clarify their differences. The discussion emphasizes the importance of these distinctions in physics, particularly in collision scenarios.
Jeff5738
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Not exactly a homework question, so sorry if I'm in the wrong forum

Homework Statement



I'm trying to understand the difference between KE and momentum.

Homework Equations



It seems to me that:
In a collision, KE can be converted into heat, which is a kind of KE/potential energy because it is the vibration of atoms: ie, energy is conserved, but it can change into a different kind of energy.

But what about momentum? As far as I understand, momentum is always conserved, even in inelastic collisions. But if some of the KE has become heat after a collision, why can't some of the momentum become heat, too. Or don't vibrating atoms have momentum?

The Attempt at a Solution



OK. Maybe I'm seeing a possible answer here: because those atoms are vibrating randomly in different directions, the aggregate momentum of the body warmed after the collision does not change due to the warming. Momentum can't be changed into heat and the body has to change its overall motion instead.

Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's quite hard to conceptualise but the difference can be shown by remembering that energy is a scalar quantity and momentum is a vector quantity. In a collision, due to Newton's third law of motion -- every action has an equal and opposite reaction -- the total momentum of a system is conserved. I can't really think of a way of describing this properly in terms of the question you asked, so I'll leave that to someone else.
 
You're basically correct. You need to think of momentum as a vector quantity. Immagine two trains with the same mass and magnitude of velocity collide head-on. The initial Kenitic energy was huge, but actually, momentum was zero!

p = p1 + p2 = mv -mv = 0

This is why it's important to remember that momentum is a vector quantity. The sign for momentum is going to depend on how you choose your corrdinate system. For my example above, train number 2 was traveling in the negative direction.
 
Thanks. All sorted out.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top