Difference between pendulum with a peg

  • Thread starter Thread starter *best&sweetest*
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of a pendulum interacting with a peg during a loop-the-loop motion. It highlights the confusion around the energy required for the pendulum to clear the peg, noting that a pendulum cannot be released with enough potential energy to return over the peg without additional force. Participants clarify that in one scenario, the pendulum's string goes slack while clearing the peg, while in the other, the string remains taut. The importance of initial velocity and the peg's position relative to the pivot point is emphasized. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for grasping the differences between the two pendulum scenarios.
*best&sweetest*
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
:confused: I would like to know what is the difference between pendulum with a peg just completing a loop-the-loop and the same pendulum with the same peg released so that the ball goes over the top of the peg without string going slack. I believe I'm having language problem here, I don't understand it st all. If you could put it in simplier words, that would really help. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To be honest, I don't understand your description either :P

You can't release a pendulum with enough potential energy to go back over the top again, so a bit more detail would be helpful
 
Thank you, but never mind!I somehow got my question right.
 
Office_Shredder said:
To be honest, I don't understand your description either :P

You can't release a pendulum with enough potential energy to go back over the top again, so a bit more detail would be helpful
My guess is that in the first case the ball has just enough energy to clear the peg with a slack string, while in the second case the string remains taught. In both cases the peg would be lower than the pendulum pivot, or the pendulum has to be pushed to give it an initial velocity (or both).
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top