Difference between Vav and Vrms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the resistance of a coil in a magnetic field, where the average power generated is given as 50W. The initial calculation for induced voltage (E) was incorrect, leading to a resistance value of 184Ω instead of the correct 227Ω. The distinction between average voltage (Vav) and root mean square voltage (Vrms) is emphasized, with Vav over a full cycle being zero. The integration of voltage squared over time is necessary for accurate power calculations, rather than simply averaging over a quarter cycle. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding sinusoidal functions in the context of electromagnetic induction.
Timothy Teo
Messages
5
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


[/B]
I encountered this problem during my exam. A coil of 50 turns, each with area 0.02m2 is rotated in a uniform magnetic field of magnitude 0.4T. The coil is rotated at a frequency of 60Hz. Given the average power generated is 50W, what is the resistance of the wire?

Homework Equations


[/B]
E = dΦb/dt
P = E2/R

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
E = dNBA/dt = 50*0.4*0.02/(1/60*1/4) = 96V

(1/60 * 1/4 is the time taken when magnetic flux through the coil is max to zero)

R = 962/50 = 184Ω

However, the correct answer is 227Ω. As the prof had another class to teach, i could not ask him about it. My friend who got the answer said to use another formula: E = ωBAsinωt because Vav is different from Vrms.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Timothy Teo said:
because Vav is different from Vrms.
Quite so. In fact, you did not really calculate Vav. You only considered the change in area over one quarter cycle. Had you done the same calculation over a full cycle you would have got zero.

The energy in each interval dt is V2dt/R, so that is what needs to be integrated.
 
haruspex said:
The energy in each interval dt is V2dt/R, so that is what needs to be integrated.

if i calculate the change in flux over 1/4 cycle and divide by 1/4 of the period, don't i get Vav?
 
Timothy Teo said:
if i calculate the change in flux over 1/4 cycle and divide by 1/4 of the period, don't i get Vav?
No. As already stated, Vav = 0.
 
Timothy Teo said:
if i calculate the change in flux over 1/4 cycle and divide by 1/4 of the period, don't i get Vav?
You do get some kind of average voltage, but it is not of any great interest. The value will depend on which quarter cycle. E.g. try the quarter cycle from -π/8 to +3π/8. And it will tell you nothing about the average power.
 
Orodruin said:
No. As already stated, Vav = 0.
Vav over the whole cycle is 0, that i understand. Then what exactly have i calculated?
 
haruspex said:
You do get some kind of average voltage, but it is not of any great interest.
Because V is a sinusoidal function, each of the 4 quarters have the same area right? So if i integrate each quarter individually i should be able to get V over the whole cycle?
 
Timothy Teo said:
Because V is a sinusoidal function, each of the 4 quarters have the same area right? So if i integrate each quarter individually i should be able to get V over the whole cycle?
Yes, but for half the cycle V is negative. You could take the absolute value, but as I posted it is not very meaningful. The energy over the whole cycle is ##\int_0^T \frac{V(t)^2}R.dt##, not ##\frac{(\int_0^T |V(t)|.dt)^2}{TR}##,
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Timothy Teo
Back
Top