Difference Engineering Physics, Applied Physics, traditional engineer

AI Thread Summary
Engineering physics, applied physics, and traditional engineering (mechanical and electrical) represent distinct academic paths with overlapping career opportunities. Traditional engineers focus on practical applications, building structures and systems, while physicists delve into theoretical foundations. Applied physics encompasses the study of physical principles in real-world contexts, and engineering physics specifically relates to the application of these principles in construction and design.In terms of graduate school and career prospects, engineering physics provides a versatile foundation, combining coursework from both physics and engineering disciplines. Graduates often have a wider range of options, making it suitable for those undecided between pursuing further studies in physics or engineering. Generally, engineers tend to have higher earning potential compared to physicists, but salaries can vary based on educational institutions and regional job markets.
Fluxy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi, what is the difference between engineering physics, applied physics, traditional engineering(mech E, elec E)?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In what context?
They are different names for jobs which may actually involve identical work, they are college degree courses that are defined by their course requirements... and so on.

Simplistically: Trad. Engineers build stuff, physicists work on the theory behind what engineers do, applied physics is the study of the physics of the World, and engineering physics is the part of applied physics that pertains to constructions - the bit of the World that people build.

All have disciplines that can be applied more broadly.
 
Simon Bridge said:
In what context?
They are different names for jobs which may actually involve identical work, they are college degree courses that are defined by their course requirements... and so on.

Simplistically: Trad. Engineers build stuff, physicists work on the theory behind what engineers do, applied physics is the study of the physics of the World, and engineering physics is the part of applied physics that pertains to constructions - the bit of the World that people build.

All have disciplines that can be applied more broadly.

I guess I was wondering in terms of graduate school and what careers I can pursue after obtaining these degrees.
 
Engineers usually make more money than physicists, but the rest depends on your school and the market where you live.
For grad school - you need to see your prospectus.
 
Well, at my school an engineering physics major would take all the courses that a physics major is required to take PLUS most of the courses that an ME or EE major has to take.

Engineering physics is a perfect degree for those planning on going to grad school but still haven't decided whether they want to study physics or engineering.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top