Difference Engineering Physics, Applied Physics, traditional engineer

AI Thread Summary
Engineering physics, applied physics, and traditional engineering (mechanical and electrical) represent distinct academic paths with overlapping career opportunities. Traditional engineers focus on practical applications, building structures and systems, while physicists delve into theoretical foundations. Applied physics encompasses the study of physical principles in real-world contexts, and engineering physics specifically relates to the application of these principles in construction and design.In terms of graduate school and career prospects, engineering physics provides a versatile foundation, combining coursework from both physics and engineering disciplines. Graduates often have a wider range of options, making it suitable for those undecided between pursuing further studies in physics or engineering. Generally, engineers tend to have higher earning potential compared to physicists, but salaries can vary based on educational institutions and regional job markets.
Fluxy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi, what is the difference between engineering physics, applied physics, traditional engineering(mech E, elec E)?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In what context?
They are different names for jobs which may actually involve identical work, they are college degree courses that are defined by their course requirements... and so on.

Simplistically: Trad. Engineers build stuff, physicists work on the theory behind what engineers do, applied physics is the study of the physics of the World, and engineering physics is the part of applied physics that pertains to constructions - the bit of the World that people build.

All have disciplines that can be applied more broadly.
 
Simon Bridge said:
In what context?
They are different names for jobs which may actually involve identical work, they are college degree courses that are defined by their course requirements... and so on.

Simplistically: Trad. Engineers build stuff, physicists work on the theory behind what engineers do, applied physics is the study of the physics of the World, and engineering physics is the part of applied physics that pertains to constructions - the bit of the World that people build.

All have disciplines that can be applied more broadly.

I guess I was wondering in terms of graduate school and what careers I can pursue after obtaining these degrees.
 
Engineers usually make more money than physicists, but the rest depends on your school and the market where you live.
For grad school - you need to see your prospectus.
 
Well, at my school an engineering physics major would take all the courses that a physics major is required to take PLUS most of the courses that an ME or EE major has to take.

Engineering physics is a perfect degree for those planning on going to grad school but still haven't decided whether they want to study physics or engineering.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Back
Top