Difference Engineering Physics, Applied Physics, traditional engineer

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinctions between engineering physics, applied physics, and traditional engineering disciplines such as mechanical and electrical engineering. Traditional engineers focus on practical applications and construction, while physicists delve into theoretical frameworks. Applied physics encompasses the study of real-world physics, and engineering physics specifically relates to the physics involved in construction. Engineering physics serves as an ideal preparatory degree for graduate studies in either physics or engineering, offering a comprehensive curriculum that includes both physics and engineering courses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts
  • Familiarity with engineering principles in mechanical and electrical fields
  • Knowledge of graduate school requirements in STEM fields
  • Awareness of career pathways in physics and engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research graduate programs in engineering physics and their course requirements
  • Explore career opportunities for graduates in applied physics versus traditional engineering
  • Investigate the salary differences between physicists and engineers in various markets
  • Learn about interdisciplinary applications of physics in engineering projects
USEFUL FOR

Students considering degrees in engineering physics, applied physics, or traditional engineering, as well as professionals exploring career options and graduate studies in these fields.

Fluxy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi, what is the difference between engineering physics, applied physics, traditional engineering(mech E, elec E)?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In what context?
They are different names for jobs which may actually involve identical work, they are college degree courses that are defined by their course requirements... and so on.

Simplistically: Trad. Engineers build stuff, physicists work on the theory behind what engineers do, applied physics is the study of the physics of the World, and engineering physics is the part of applied physics that pertains to constructions - the bit of the World that people build.

All have disciplines that can be applied more broadly.
 
Simon Bridge said:
In what context?
They are different names for jobs which may actually involve identical work, they are college degree courses that are defined by their course requirements... and so on.

Simplistically: Trad. Engineers build stuff, physicists work on the theory behind what engineers do, applied physics is the study of the physics of the World, and engineering physics is the part of applied physics that pertains to constructions - the bit of the World that people build.

All have disciplines that can be applied more broadly.

I guess I was wondering in terms of graduate school and what careers I can pursue after obtaining these degrees.
 
Engineers usually make more money than physicists, but the rest depends on your school and the market where you live.
For grad school - you need to see your prospectus.
 
Well, at my school an engineering physics major would take all the courses that a physics major is required to take PLUS most of the courses that an ME or EE major has to take.

Engineering physics is a perfect degree for those planning on going to grad school but still haven't decided whether they want to study physics or engineering.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
920
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K