Differential equation - looking for a minor mistake in my solution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving differential equations related to the spread of diseases through carriers. The user successfully solves the first equation for carriers, confirming that y = y_0 e^{-\beta t}. However, they struggle with the second equation for susceptibles, initially miscalculating the solution for x. Upon review, it is determined that the user's solution for x is indeed correct, and the mistake in part (c) stems from a misunderstanding of the signs in the limiting behavior. Ultimately, both parts (b) and (c) are validated as correct.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
Folks, I'm looking for a minor mistake in my solution. Any help is highly appreciated.

"Some diseases (such as typhoid fever) are spread largely by carriers, individuals who can transmit the disease, but who exibit no overt symptoms. Let x and y, respectively, denote the proportion of susceptibles and carriers in the population. Suppose that carriers are identified and removed from the population at a rate \beta, so

\frac{dy}{dt}=-\beta y \mbox{.} \qquad \qquad \mbox{(i)}

Suppose also that the disease spreads at a rate proportional to the product of x and y; thus

\frac{dx}{dt}=\alpha x y \mbox{.} \qquad \qquad \mbox{(ii)}

(a) Determine y at any time t by solving Eq. (i) subject to the initial condition y(0)=y_0.

(b) Use the result of part (a) to find x at any time t by solving Eq. (ii) subject to the initial condition x(0)=x_0.

(c) Find the proportion of the population that escapes the epidemic by finding the limiting amount of x as t \to \infty.

Answers:

(a) y=y_0 e^{-\beta t}

(b) x=x_0 \exp \left[ -\frac{\alpha y_0}{\beta} \left( 1 - e^{-\beta t} \right) \right]

(c) \lim _{t\to \infty} x = x_0 \exp \left( -\frac{\alpha y_0}{\beta} \right)"

My work:

(a) THIS ONE IS OK.

\frac{dy}{dt} = - \beta y\mbox{,} \qquad y(0) = y_0

\int \frac{dy}{y} = - \beta \int dt

\ln \left| y \right| = -\beta y + \mathrm{C}

\left| y \right| = \xi e^{-\beta t} \mbox{,} \qquad \xi = e^{\mathrm{C}}

y = \xi e^{-\beta t}

y(0) = y_0 \Rightarrow \xi = y_0 \Rightarrow y = y_0 e^{-\beta t}

(b) I CAN'T FIND EXACTLY WHERE I MADE A MISTAKE DOWN HERE.

\frac{dx}{dt} = \alpha x y \mbox{,} \qquad x(0) = x_0

\frac{dx}{dt} = \alpha x y_0 e^{-\beta t}

\int \frac{dx}{x} = \alpha y_0 \int e^{-\beta t} \: dt

\ln \left| x \right| = -\frac{\alpha y_0}{\beta} e^{-\beta t} + \mathrm{C}

\left| x \right| = \theta \exp \left( -\frac{\alpha y_0}{\beta} e^{-\beta t} \right) \mbox{,} \qquad \theta = e^{\mathrm{C}}

x = \theta \exp \left( -\frac{\alpha y_0}{\beta} e^{-\beta t} \right)

x(0) = x_0 \Rightarrow \theta = x_0 \exp \left( \frac{\alpha y_0}{\beta} \right) \Rightarrow x = x_0 \exp \left[ -\frac{\alpha y_0}{\beta} \left( e^{-\beta t} -1 \right) \right]

(c) I CAN'T FIND EXACTLY WHERE I MADE A MISTAKE DOWN HERE.

\lim _{t\to \infty} x = x_0 \exp \left( \frac{\alpha y_0}{\beta} \right)


Thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Take the derivative of the answer given for x, and what you have for x. Just looking at it, it appears your solution satisfies the differential equation, and the given answer does not. Again, I just glanced at it, but I think that the "problem" in part c just follows from the "problem" in part b; the negative sign just carries over.
 
That's true, but I didn't expect it. Anyway...

If

x=x_0 \exp \left[ -\frac{\alpha y_0}{\beta} \left( e^{-\beta t} - 1 \right) \right] \mbox{,}

then

\frac{dx}{dt} = \alpha x_0 y_0 \exp \left[ -\frac{\alpha y_0}{\beta} \left( e^{-\beta t} - 1 \right) - \beta t \right]

\frac{dx}{dt} = \alpha x_0 \exp \left[ -\frac{\alpha y_0}{\beta} \left( e^{-\beta t} - 1 \right) \right] y_0 e^{- \beta t}

\frac{dx}{dt} = \alpha xy

So, (b) and (c) are also correct!

Thanks
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top