Dimensional Analysis in Halliday/Resnick

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem from Halliday/Resnick's "Fundamentals of Physics" regarding the relationship between three clocks (A, B, and C) that run at different rates. The main challenge involves determining the time intervals on clocks B and C based on given readings from clock A and understanding the ratios of their rates. Participants clarify that the clocks were not started simultaneously, which affects the calculations, particularly the y-intercepts in the linear functions representing the clocks' relationships. Correct calculations reveal that when clock A reads 400 seconds, clock B reads 198 seconds, and when clock C reads 15 seconds, clock B reads -245 seconds. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting the problem's conditions to derive the correct relationships and offsets between the clocks.
Blargian
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello world! I'm busy working through Halliday/Resnick Fundamentals of Physics chapter 1 and I'm having some difficulty with this particular question. I'll do my best to explain my reasoning and attempt at the problem

1. Homework Statement


The problem: Three different clocks A, B and C run at different rates and do not have simultaneous readings of zero. Figure 1-6 shows simultaneous readings on pairs of the clocks for four occasions. (At the earliest occasion, for example, B reads 25.0 s and C reads 92.0s.) If two events are 600 s apart on clock A, how far apart are they on (a) clock B and (b) clock C? (c) When clock A reads 400 s, what does clock B read? (d) When clock C reads 15.0 s, what does clock B read? (Assume negative readings for prezero times.)

See diagram below:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/nihu76a6o7xwskv/physicsdiagram.jpg?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/nihu76a6o7xwskv/physicsdiagram.jpg

Homework Equations



This is more of a logic problem than anything else. The question states that A, B and C do not have simultaneous readings of zero), in other words the clocks were not started at the same time. Because the rates are different one would need to find the ratios of the clock speeds in relation to each other.

The Attempt at a Solution



A) We see that for A and B the interval readings line up, although at different rates. In order to compare we need to make sure we are comparing over the same interval so we subtract 312 from 512 for A and 125 from 290 for B. We can then get the ratios A/B and B/A. A is 1.21 x B and B is 0.825 x A. Therefore if two events are 600s apart on A they are (600)(0.825) = 495 seconds on B. This matches the book's answer.

B) Since we have already obtained the ratio of A to B, we now just need B to C. We subtract 25.0 from 200 for B and 92.0 from 142 for C to give ratios of 175/50 and 50/175 or 3.5 : 0.286... therefore 600 on A (495 on B) is equal to 495(0.286...) = 141s when rounded off. This is the textbooks answer.

C) This is where i go wrong. I said if Clock A = 400 then using the ratio obtained in question 1 B will be 400(0.825) = 330s. This is wrong and the answer should be 198s

D) I said if C=15.0s then B would read 52.5s as the ratio of C to B is 0.286: 3.5. The correct answer is -245s.

-------------------------------------

The solutions manual states that the time on any of the clocks is a straight-line function of that on another, where slopes cannot = 1 and y-intercepts cannot = 0. From this they deduce

tC = 2/7(tB) + 594/7 and tB = 33/40(tA) - 662/5

This makes sense to me that each time would be a function of another. the gradient of each function is the ratio to the next however I do not understand how the Y-intercept of the functions (the + 594/7 and -662/5) where obtained from the graph.

Any explanation of this would be greatly appreciated.
- Shaun
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Blargian said:
C) This is where i go wrong. I said if Clock A = 400 then using the ratio obtained in question 1 B will be 400(0.825) = 330s. This is wrong and the answer should be 198s
I hope that you realized yourself that this was the wrong answer, as 400 s on the A clock will necessarily be between 125 s and 290 s on the B clock.

Blargian said:
I do not understand how the Y-intercept of the functions (the + 594/7 and -662/5) where obtained from the graph.
Once you have found the ratio between two clocks, you take one point where simultaneous readings are made, and figure out what is the offset between the clocks.
 
Blargian said:
C) This is where i go wrong. I said if Clock A = 400 then using the ratio obtained in question 1 B will be 400(0.825) = 330s. This is wrong and the answer should be 198s

D) I said if C=15.0s then B would read 52.5s as the ratio of C to B is 0.286: 3.5. The correct answer is -245s.
You are here assuming that the clocks showed zero at the same time, exactly what the problem told you not to do.
 
DrClaude said:
I hope that you realized yourself that this was the wrong answer, as 400 s on the A clock will necessarily be between 125 s and 290 s on the B clock.

I didn't when i was working the problem. But i see now this is the case due to the fact that the clocks were started at different times.

DrClaude said:
Once you have found the ratio between two clocks, you take one point where simultaneous readings are made, and figure out what is the offset between the clocks.

Thanks very much for your reply! I took a point on A where they lined up and 'converted it' into B time using the ratio and then subtracted the two values to obtain the offset. Same for B and C.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
19K
Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top