Dipole in an external electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the expression for torque on a dipole in an external electric field, questioning why it is represented as PxE instead of ExP. The key point raised is the significance of the order of the cross product in vector mathematics, where A x B yields a direction opposite to B x A. This difference is crucial in defining positive and negative directions for vector quantities, including torque and angular velocity. The conversation suggests that these definitions are rooted in the chosen coordinate system. Ultimately, understanding the vector properties and their implications is essential for accurately describing the torque on a dipole.
Prashasti
Messages
63
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Why isn't the expression for torque on a dipole kept in an external electric field ExP? Why is it PxE?
No such indication has been given in any of the derivations, that it is mandatory for it to be PxE, so why can't it be ExP?

2. The attempt at a solution
Is it all about experiments?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Prashasti said:

Homework Statement


Why isn't the expression for torque on a dipole kept in an external electric field ExP? Why is it PxE?
No such indication has been given in any of the derivations, that it is mandatory for it to be PxE, so why can't it be ExP?

2. The attempt at a solution
Is it all about experiments?
What's the essential difference in the cross products A x B versus B x A?
 
The direction of the resultant of A x B is just opposite to that of B x A...
 
Prashasti said:
The direction of the resultant of A x B is just opposite to that of B x A...
Right. So it comes down to the definitions of positive or negative directions for quantities in the chosen coordinate system. This includes assumed directions for positive or negative torques, angular velocities, etc., which are vector quantities (or pseudo vector quantities in some cases, but that's another topic).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top