Dirac Lagrangian invariance under chiral transformation

ppedro
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Consider the Dirac Lagrangian,

L =\overline{\psi}\left(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-m\right)\psi,

where \overline{\psi}=\psi^{\dagger}\gamma^{0}, and show that, for \alpha\in\mathbb{R} and in the limit m\rightarrow0, it is invariant under the chiral transformation

\psi\rightarrow\psi'=e^{i\alpha\gamma_{5}}\psi

\psi^{\dagger}\rightarrow\left(\psi^{\dagger}\right)'=\psi^{\dagger}e^{-i\alpha\gamma_{5}}

Attempt at a solution


\begin{array}{ll}<br /> L&#039; &amp; =\overline{\psi}&#039;\left(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-m\right)\psi&#039;\\<br /> &amp; =\left(\psi^{\dagger}\right)&#039;\gamma^{0}\left(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-m\right)\psi&#039;\\<br /> &amp; =\psi^{\dagger}e^{-i\alpha\gamma_{5}}\gamma^{0}\left(i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}-m\right)e^{i\alpha\gamma_{5}}\psi\\<br /> &amp; =\underset{(i)}{\underbrace{i\psi^{\dagger}e^{-i\alpha\gamma_{5}}\gamma^{0}\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}e^{i\alpha\gamma_{5}}\psi}}-\underset{(ii)}{\underbrace{m\psi^{\dagger}e^{-i\alpha\gamma_{5}}\gamma^{0}e^{i\alpha\gamma_{5}}\psi}}\\<br /> &amp; =<br /> \end{array}

For (ii) I tried using \exp\left(s\hat{X}\right)\hat{Y}\exp\left(-s\hat{X}\right)=\hat{Y}+s\left[\hat{X},\hat{Y}\right] to get

\begin{array}{ll}<br /> (ii) &amp; =m\psi^{\dagger}e^{-i\alpha\gamma_{5}}\gamma^{0}e^{i\alpha\gamma_{5}}\psi\\<br /> &amp; =m\psi^{\dagger}\left(\gamma^{0}-i\alpha\left[\gamma_{5},\gamma^{0}\right]\right)\psi\\<br /> &amp; =<br /> \end{array}

Can you help me finish this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: ##\gamma_5## anti-commutes with all gamma matrices, including ##\gamma^0##.
 
Orodruin said:
Hint: ##\gamma_5## anti-commutes with all gamma matrices, including ##\gamma^0##.

I don't see it... Do you mean I should use that in (i) while also applying BCH's formula?
 
ppedro said:
I don't see it... Do you mean I should use the in (i) while also aplying BCH's formula?
There is no point in using the BCH formula. Just use the anti-commutativity.
 
How can I anti-commute with something that's in the exponent?
 
ppedro said:
How can I anti-commute with something that's in the exponent?
Use the series expansion of the exponent.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top