Why Do Floating Logs Move in the Opposite Direction When You Walk on Them?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fusilli_Jerry89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Floating Log
AI Thread Summary
When walking on a floating log, it moves in the opposite direction due to the conservation of momentum. As a person steps forward, they exert a force on the log, causing it to move backward. This interaction highlights the principles of physics, particularly the conservation of linear momentum. The initial state of the log changes as the person applies force, resulting in the log's movement. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the underlying physics of the situation.
Fusilli_Jerry89
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When you walk along a floting log in water, why does it move in the opposite direction?

Is it because of the friction from you walking pushes the log in the opposite direction, or is there something else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
Is it because of the friction from you walking pushes the log in the opposite direction, or is there something else?
Well obviously there must be some connection, no ?

You need to investigate a whole lot deeper. Your explanation is not really "what doing physics is all about", wouldn't you say ?

GENERAL HINTS :

1) think of conservation of ... (energy, "linear" momentum, etc etc)
2) what changes in the log's initial state as you walk on it (the answer is in my answer) ?

marlon
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top